| More
Home / Articles


Posted On April 1, 1998
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Anatomy of a Smear Campaign


Want to launch a national media campaign against a particular product or industry? Here's all you'll need: a targeted product or industry, an outlandish accusation, "innocent victims" (usually children), the "bad guys," a parade of "expert witnesses" and, quite often, a gratuitous link to the tobacco industry.

The smear campaign has proven so effective for the food police that it has become a "cookie cutter" operation. The cover story of a recent issue of The Nation magazine provides a classic example of the campaign at work.

Target: Soft drink, coffee and tea industries.

Outlandish Accusations:

  • "Scientific research has linked caffeine to anxiety, respiratory ailments, possible bone loss and other health worries.""'Soda barons' have used… sly marketing ploys" to target children.
  • "Children can become dependent on caffeine."
  • Coke and Pepsi "are pushing a drug on pre-adults, one that may have serious health consequences for a whole generation."

Victims: "Kids," "teens and younger kids," "children."

Bad Guys: "Caffeine, Inc.," "major caffeine suppliers," "soda barons," "executives at Coke and Pepsi," "soda conglomerates' lobbyists," "Starbucks."

The Expert Witnesses and Their Charges:

  • The American Medical Association says caffeinated sodas are "aggressively advertised" to kids.
  • The American Dietetic Association worries "children won't reach sufficient bone mass." "
  • A Johns Hopkins University professor calls caffeine a "pharmacological destabilizer."

Link to Tobacco: "[C]affeine suppliers are following the example of another supplier of an addictive substance: the tobacco companies."



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Momentum Builds Against Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Thursday 3/18/2010
  • Critics Sound Off Against Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Monday 3/8/2010
  • Food Cops Prepare for Round 2
    Posted On: Wednesday 3/3/2010
  • The Golden State Soda Tax
    Posted On: Friday 2/19/2010
  • A Stimulus for Food Cops' Appetites
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/17/2010
  • CSPI: Kings of Gripe
    Posted On: Tuesday 2/9/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    Obesity activists a public health threat
    Did you know your soda is a public health menace? read more here »

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.