Home / Letters To The Editor


Posted On February 16, 2001
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Sodas increase kids' risk of obesity, study reports

Arguments against soda fizzle when examined closely

By: David Martosko
Newspaper: The St. Louis Post-Dispatch

A coordinated cultural war is being waged against soft drinks. A Washington Post headline read: "Research suggests kids who drink a lot of soft drinks risk becoming fat, weak-boned, cavity-prone and caffeine-addicted." The Post-Dispatch said, "Sodas increase kids' risk of obesity, study reports." The effort to denormalize fizzy beverages generally emphasizes four flawed arguments.

Harvard researcher David Ludwig's study in the British medical journal The Lancet claimed to connect soda drinking to obesity. However, a Lancet editorial observed that "a large proportion of the children (in Ludwig's study) were obese" to begin with, which, the Lancet points out, certainly affected the study's outcome.

Ludwig himself wrote "there is no clear evidence that consumption of sugar per se affects food intake in a unique manner or causes obesity." The obvious flaws in Ludwig's research also earned this response from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: "There are no data from the Harvard study that allow us to make an estimate of what proportion of obesity might be accounted for by changes in soft drink consumption."

The baseless contention that soft drink leads to caffeine dependence in kids depends entirely on the work of anti-soda activist Roland Griffiths. His research was designed to show that the popularity of caffeinated soft drinks comes from "the mood-altering and physical dependence of caffeine."

Alan Leshner, director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse (which funded Griffiths' research) argues this, noting that Griffiths' study included only 25 subjects, too few to allow real scientific conclusions. An earlier study by Griffiths was criticized by the International Food Information Council for trying to demonstrate caffeine addiction using a "sample size of only seven subjects," himself and six fellow researchers.

As for soft drink consumption causing tooth decay: In the United States, cavities have been on the decline among children at the same time their soda consumption has increased. Still, the Ohio Dental Association cautions that "acid begins to dissolve tooth enamel in only 20 minutes." So, swallow before 20 minutes are up -- and brush.

The myth that soft drinks can deplete bones of calcium lives on in the work of Harvard public health researcher Grace Wyshak. Last year, her study concluding that "girls who drank cola were about five times more likely to suffer bone fractures." Imagine what she might have written if she had actually measured her young subjects' bone density (she didn't), or if the participants had been asked how much soda they drank. (They weren't.)

In Wyshak's words: "the (study) design is cross-sectional and causality cannot be inferred from the data." This means her study did not prove her point.



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Letters

Beware 'obesity tax'
Putting an IRS bean counter in every vending machine by implementing a soda and junk-food tax isn't an effective tool for reducing obesity rates. read more here »

Soda tax won't improve health
The new report from the New England Journal of Medicine claims taxing soda would reduce obesity rates while generating billions of dollars in revenue. However, many studies have found that taxing soda is not effective for shrinking our waistlines. read more here »

Soft-drink tax
Michael Jacobson's claim that taxing soft drinks is a good idea because they're "unnecessary" is great recession rhetoric. The argument that soda taxes are an effective preventive health measure is also a timely ruse. read more here »

OpEds

Hard-boiled animal activists could threaten vaccine supply
In the post-9/11 world, the phrase "national security" conjures up images of dirty bombs, jihadists, white powder and biohazard labels. It should also bring to mind another picture: an egg. read more here »

NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.