Home / Letters To The Editor


Posted On September 26, 2004
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


PETA's true goals are too radical

By: David Martosko
Newspaper: The Charleston Gazette

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals isn't fooling anyone with its insistence that Kentucky Fried Chicken should force its suppliers into modest "animal welfare" reforms. ("KFC's woes, and how to fix them" Aug. 1) In fact, PETA's long-term aim is to entirely abolish the consumption of chicken - along with beef, pork, fish, and dairy foods.

At a recent animal-rights convention, PETA president Ingrid Newkirk addressed the issue of pressure campaigns that force businesses to change their animal welfare guidelines. "If anybody wonders about what's this with all these reforms," she said, "you can hear us clearly. Our goal is total animal liberation."

"Total animal liberation" doesn't mean that future three-piece dinners get a little more wing-flapping room. It means we don't get to eat them. Period. It also means no pet ownership, no milk from cows, no leather, no circuses, and a long list of other no-no's from this animal worship cult.

Any company pressured by PETA to make incremental changes in the name of "animal welfare" should understand this before they sit down to talk with these extremists.



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Letters

Donation questioned
The Eagles are making a huge mistake in giving $50,000 to the deceptive Humane Society of the United States. read more here »

Issue 2 failure might mean loss of jobs
Issue 2 promises to be a defining moment for agriculture in Ohio, as voters will have a rare opportunity to protect farmers from the Humane Society of the United States. read more here »

Don’t blame it on burgers
It's laughable for Susan Levin to claim (column Aug. 1), without citing any evidence, that rising obesity rates are caused by our "high-fat, meat-heavy diets." read more here »

OpEds

Hard-boiled animal activists could threaten vaccine supply
In the post-9/11 world, the phrase "national security" conjures up images of dirty bombs, jihadists, white powder and biohazard labels. It should also bring to mind another picture: an egg. read more here »

NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.