Home / Letters To The Editor


Posted On October 21, 2005
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Junk science

By: David Martosko
Newspaper: San Francisco Chronicle

At least California's attorney general got one thing correct in his recent Open Forum article ("Junk food and junk science," Oct. 17). Someone is "peddling junk science" in the debate over food-borne acrylamide. His name is Bill Lockyer.

Food-borne acrylamide poses no risk to Californians' health. The chemical occurs naturally when starchy foods are exposed to heat (be they bread or french fries). But humans would have to eat more than 182 pounds of fries -- every day, for the rest of their lives -- in order to have the same cancer risk suffered by lab rats in published studies.

Besides, acrylamide is also plentiful in olives, almonds, asparagus, spinach, beets and prune juice. Scaring Americans about these foods will only steer them away from vital nutrients and leave consumers confused about legitimate health threats. For that, Lockyer should be ashamed.



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Letters

FARM activists getting lazy
The recent H1N1 outbreak was a field day for all kinds of Chicken Little opportunists. But animal rights activists continue to act as the pacesetters. read more here »

ACRYLAMIDE: Takes huge amount to cause health risk
Scaring people about acrylamide will have the paradoxical effect of making people less healthy by turning them away from olives, almonds, asparagus, spinach, beets and prune juice -- all acrylamide-rich foods. read more here »

Scare tactics don't leave room for adequate science
There's a reason that Dr. David Ludwig wants politicians to hurry and regulate our diets before they get all the facts. The evidence doesn't support him. read more here »

OpEds

Hard-boiled animal activists could threaten vaccine supply
In the post-9/11 world, the phrase "national security" conjures up images of dirty bombs, jihadists, white powder and biohazard labels. It should also bring to mind another picture: an egg. read more here »

NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.