| More
Home / Letters To The Editor


Posted On December 8, 2007
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


FDA doesn't need to meddle in salt content of foods

By: Trice Whitefield
Newspaper: Sun-Sentinel

Though the Food and Drug Administration is considering limits on the salt content of foods, it would be better served reviewing the limits of its authority ("Salt sneaking into your diet through processed foods," Dec. 1).

Salt is unique to products previously regulated by the agency. Our bodies need salt to function. The advocacy groups pushing for controls claim that the amount of salt consumed, rather than salt itself, is harmful. But even at high intake levels, there's no direct evidence (like the proof against cigarettes) that sodium causes disease.

Let's face it. Too much of any good thing (carrots, vitamins, exercise, etc.) can be bad for your health. And that's doubly true for government.



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Letters

FDA doesn't need to meddle in salt content of foods
But even at high intake levels, there's no direct evidence (like the proof against cigarettes) that sodium causes disease. read more here »

FDA should pass the salt
Though the Federal Drug Administration is considering federal limits on the salt-content of foods, it would be better served reviewing the limits of its authority. read more here »

FDA should back off on salt
Too much of any good thing (carrots, vitamins, exercise, etc.) can be bad for your health. read more here »

OpEds

‘Tis not the season to be annoyingly wary
This time of year, people watching their weight while facing down holiday happy hours and open houses can be particularly susceptible to scaremongering by the fat police. read more here »

Food activists are all jeer, no cheer
Don't let the holiday season magic be tainted by activists' food curses. One thing we can be thankful for is our ability to ignore them. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.