printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


The "War on Fat": A Review

In recognition of the month when America celebrates its freedom, we are devoting the first two weeks of July to a review of the ongoing battle for consumer freedom -- the threats and the promise. Today, a review of recent developments in the "War on Fat." (We will be taking tomorrow and Friday off to fire up our backyard grills, pop open a beverage, and celebrate Independence Day.)

Easily the most active front in the war on consumer freedom is the campaign to regulate and restrict food options in a so-called "War on Fat." Here's just a sampling of the latest:

  • The New York Times called the obesity battle "a culture war for the new century." On one side, "lawyers who pioneered suits against tobacco companies." On the other, advocates of consumer freedom. "The lawyers filing these suits hope to do to Mega Gulps and Twinkies what they did to Joe Camel and tobacco," writes the Times -- demonizing a product, taxing it out of reach of consumers, and restricting the places where it can be bought and consumed.

  • Other leading media slammed food as the culprit, a sign of activists' increasing success in selling a one-sided anti-consumer argument to the press. We're a nation of "Junk-Food Junkies," says The New York Post. A "Twinkie tax" must force us "to pay for our poor eating habits" because "obesity is spreading across America like a cancer," says The San Antonio Express-News. "All Ages Addicted to 'Junk' Food," screams a UPI headline.

  • Activist/author Marion Nestle declares that "sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should." Kelly Brownell opines that "Congress and state legislatures could shift the focus to the environment by taxing foods with little nutritional value… The least healthy would be given the highest tax rate… Consumption of high-fat food would drop." Both are linked to the grand-nanny of them all, the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

  • Anti-tobacco attorney John Banzhaf now plans "an onslaught on the junk-food industry as a whole" as part of his crusade to equate food with tobacco. The George Washington University professor heads up an organization that promises "hundreds of billions [YES, BILLIONS!] of dollars" from anti-tobacco lawsuits. Now, he says "tactics used against the tobacco industry very successfully… could be used against the problem of obesity." He adds: "As we've done with regard to cigarettes, [we could] put a higher tax on foods."

  • The Center for Science in the Public Interest unveiled a shocking report revealing that pizza contains cheese. Writes The Dubuque Telegraph Herald's Ken Brown: "I always thought pizza was a diet food. That notion was cleared up when the Center for Science in the Public Interest did a study… Good work guys." Adds Holly Love of The Philadelphia Inquirer: "[CSPI] has just declared that all that cheese and meaty topping should have only a cameo appearance in a meal, not a starring role. The 'good news' is that they strongly endorse pizza with little or no cheese and lots of vegetables instead of sausage or pepperoni. Isn't that called 'salad'?"

  • email us comments




    printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

    Daily Headlines

  • A Godzilla of Corny Hype
    Posted On: Thursday 11/19/2009
  • Toss Out the Myths With the Embalming Fluid
    Posted On: Wednesday 11/18/2009
  • Just “Say No” to Bogus Health Tips
    Posted On: Monday 11/16/2009
  • OJ with Breakfast? Repent!
    Posted On: Monday 11/9/2009
  • Soda Scam Goes Hollywood
    Posted On: Friday 11/6/2009
  • Lawyer Math: 1 + 1 = Prop. 65
    Posted On: Monday 11/2/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/20/2009
  • More Syrupy Pseudo-Science
    Posted On: Monday 10/19/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    OpEds

    Eat well, but don't skip your exercise
    Unsuccessful dieters and overzealous policymakers might consider that they might have been focusing on the wrong side of the weight-loss equation. read more here »

    Lack of exercise is the problem
    State-by-state obesity trends make more sense when you look at the other side of the obesity equation — physical activity. Simply put, residents of states with high obesity rates tend to move less. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.