printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


SHAC Attack

If they wanted attention, they surely have it now. The violent activist group known as "Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty" (SHAC) is a special-interest subset of an FBI-certified "terrorist group" called the Animal Liberation Front (ALF). SHAC is singularly dedicated to destroying a medical research company that uses laboratory animals in its search for clues to curing breast cancer and Parkinson's Disease.

Last week the group detonated military smoke bombs in downtown Seattle office buildings. In response, our director of research wrote a guest column in the Seattle Times, suggesting a connection between such terrorist acts and a recent animal rights convention held in Northern Virginia. SHAC's membership uses the Internet's built-in anonymity to foment violence; a few days before the Seattle attack, one budding thug posted a threatening message on an Internet bulletin board using the screen alias "If eating meat doesn't kill you, I will!"

The SHAC web site claims "credit" for violent crimes and grand theft, and even provides identifying information -- height, weight, license plate number, dog's name, spouse's work habits, etc. -- on targeted executives, in the hope that activists will take matters into their own hands.

The Philadelphia Inquirer has had enough. In a lead editorial, the Inquirer rails against "criminals" who "say they stand for less violence" but "end up using it." And discussing SHAC's smoke-bomb attack on Seattle, editors at the Everett (WA) Herald opined on Monday that "these domestic terrorists preyed on the vulnerability of innocent people, leaving us to wonder -- what were they thinking?"

The Herald need look no further than the "Animal Rights 2002" conference, where SHAC leader Kevin Jonas (himself a former ALF "spokesperson") advised hundreds of activists that "you don't need a 4-year degree to call in a bomb hoax." In Jonas' opinion, "the animal rights movement is strong," and "it's time to start flexing our muscles."

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Will PETA Protest Itself?
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • Sucker, Can You Spare a Dime (for HSUS)?
    Posted On: Tuesday 11/17/2009
  • Exposing the Animal Rights Agenda
    Posted On: Friday 11/13/2009
  • The Bacon Beckoning
    Posted On: Thursday 11/12/2009
  • Vegetarian Book Makes Meatless Arguments
    Posted On: Thursday 11/5/2009
  • Marley and Meat
    Posted On: Tuesday 11/3/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Friday 10/30/2009
  • “Physicians Committee” Abuses the Law. Again.
    Posted On: Thursday 10/29/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

    OpEds

    Hard-boiled animal activists could threaten vaccine supply
    In the post-9/11 world, the phrase "national security" conjures up images of dirty bombs, jihadists, white powder and biohazard labels. It should also bring to mind another picture: an egg. read more here »

    Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
    PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.