Home / Soft Drinks / Headlines


September 26, 2002
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


1960s radicals lead the charge against… soda pop?

When the board of the Los Angeles Unified School District voted to ban soft drinks last month, they had a silent partner: the Center for Food and Justice, a “project” of the “Urban and Environmental Policy Institute” at Occidental College. This academic activist hotbed is funded by the California Endowment, the California Wellness Foundation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Public Health Institute (which has its own anti-soda axe to grind).

The Public Health Institute, by the way, has also produced “research” for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, including “Wallet to Waistline,” the report responsible for the startling news that larger meals give you more calories.

But back to Occidental College. The Center for Food and Justice (CFJ) has produced a report outlining the methods that were employed to convince the Los Angeles school board to do away with Coke and Pepsi.

The report, “Challenging the Soda Companies,” aims to be a blueprint for future anti-corporate efforts in academia. It calls anti-soda efforts in schools “a significant organizing opportunity” for food activists in California. It’s clear that CFJ’s strategy continues to be effective: on the heels of the L.A. decision, the Fresno school district now has a majority of school board members who are committed to a soda-pop ban.

While the report itself is telling enough, we found it most interesting to look at its authors. Here, then, is some basic information about those who were really behind the L.A. decision:

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • A Not-So-Sweet Marketing Gimmick
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • Just “Say No” to Bogus Health Tips
    Posted On: Monday 11/16/2009
  • OJ with Breakfast? Repent!
    Posted On: Monday 11/9/2009
  • Soda Scam Goes Hollywood
    Posted On: Friday 11/6/2009
  • Crushing Beverage Tax Proposals
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/27/2009
  • The Empire State Strikes Back?
    Posted On: Wednesday 10/21/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009
  • Food Cops’ Obesity Message is Off-Key
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/13/2009
  • Start Spreadin’ the News: No New Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Thursday 10/8/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »

    Fat chance food cops will simply let us be
    If you’re planning on visiting New York City anytime soon, you’ll be treated to sordid subway pictures of soft drinks turning into yellow globs of human fat. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.