Home / Big Fat Lies / Headlines


November 14, 2002
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Whose fault is our fat?

Even if you accept the proposition that America is so fat it’s literally bursting at the seams -- a presumption that depends on some fuzzy government math -- the question still remains: whom should we blame?

At yesterday’s meeting of the American Public Health Association, food nanny extraordinaire Marion Nestle took some cheap shots at food companies and restaurants. She charged that “food is too cheap in this country,” and that meals eaten at restaurants are, by definition, “higher in calories than foods consumed inside the home.”

Nestle told a standing-room-only crowd of over 1200 public health professionals that “the food industry and the government are in a conspiracy to get people to eat more.” She offered several “solutions,” including the idea of “adjusting tax policies” (read: Twinkie Taxes) in order to convince people to eat the “right” things.

Marion Nestle is not alone on this “fat tax” bandwagon. Yale researcher Kelly Brownell originally started it rolling, and continues to suggest that “the least healthy foods” should “be given the highest tax rate.”

The public health crowd, of course, needs powerful allies in government if they want to change the tax law. So far, so good. Take New York City, for example, where two city council members are trying to ban sweets and soda pop from schools.

Anti-capitalists North of the border are also convinced that food companies should be forced to wear a target on their collective backs. Adbusters magazine founder and socialist firebrand Kalle Lasn recently told Strategy magazine that “for many years, tobacco was the big pariah industry and it took a while to wrestle it down to the point where it’s on the defensive. I believe… food won’t be far behind.”

So if all the self-anointed “experts” are ready to tar and feather food companies and restaurants, what are ordinary people thinking? Brace yourself.

According to a scientific poll released on Tuesday by the opinion research firm PlanetFeedback, Americans “are far less willing to blame the food and restaurant industry than they are to blame a lack of education and self-responsibility for the country’s weight problem.” In fact, 84 percent of those surveyed placed the primary responsibility for Americans’ weight problem on “individuals who do not exercise enough.”

USA Today reported recently that 75 percent of Americans “don’t… get at least 30 minutes of physical activity most days of the week.”

And it appears that even the food police themselves can fail in this regard. According to the Associated Press, Kelly Brownell (the father of the “Twinkie Tax” himself), “sports a good-sized paunch thanks, he says, to a book project that has kept him relatively sedentary.”

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • A Godzilla of Corny Hype
    Posted On: Thursday 11/19/2009
  • Toss Out the Myths With the Embalming Fluid
    Posted On: Wednesday 11/18/2009
  • Just “Say No” to Bogus Health Tips
    Posted On: Monday 11/16/2009
  • OJ with Breakfast? Repent!
    Posted On: Monday 11/9/2009
  • Soda Scam Goes Hollywood
    Posted On: Friday 11/6/2009
  • Lawyer Math: 1 + 1 = Prop. 65
    Posted On: Monday 11/2/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/20/2009
  • More Syrupy Pseudo-Science
    Posted On: Monday 10/19/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    OpEds

    Eat well, but don't skip your exercise
    Unsuccessful dieters and overzealous policymakers might consider that they might have been focusing on the wrong side of the weight-loss equation. read more here »

    Lack of exercise is the problem
    State-by-state obesity trends make more sense when you look at the other side of the obesity equation — physical activity. Simply put, residents of states with high obesity rates tend to move less. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.