| More
Home / Adult Beverages / Headlines


January 6, 2003
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


More Inflated Than Your Airbags

Thursday’s Sacramento Bee editorial page included a scathing review of the nationwide push for lowered drunk-driving arrest thresholds. So far, 17 states have resisted the federally strong-armed blood-alcohol content (BAC) limit of 0.08, despite Uncle Sam’s threat to withhold vital highway funds from any state that dares stare him down.

But as we’ve been telling you, a 50-state march toward 0.08 standards will do little more than criminalize responsible adults. And public health evidence in support of 0.08 is sorely lacking. “Across the country,” notes the Bee, “having an 0.08 standard does not seem to lower the rate of alcohol-related deaths.”

Even more troubling: according to the Bee, it now seems that the generally accepted statistics on drunk-driving deaths are greatly exaggerated. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says that 17,448 people died in 2001 in alcohol-related traffic accidents. And MADD uses this number to claim that drunk drivers are responsible for 41 percent of all U.S. traffic fatalities. But the term “alcohol related” is a much broader catch-all than MADD’s zealots would have us believe.

Thursday’s Bee editorial quoted a Los Angeles Times story for its conclusion that “between 2,500 to 3,500 of those fatal crashes involved drivers who were not legally drunk, but where alcohol was detected. Another 1,770 crashes involved drunken pedestrians who walked in front of sober drivers. Another 8,000 involved single-car crashes in which the only person killed was the drunken driver. That leaves about 5,000 that actually involved innocent victims of a drunken driver.”

A serious problem, to be sure, but nowhere near the magnitude suggested by MADD in a bid to justify their prohibitionist-like campaign against any drinking prior to driving. According to the CDC, you are nearly 6 times more likely to commit suicide than to be killed by a drunk driver.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Drink To Your Health
    Posted On: Thursday 1/10/2008
  • If Bacon Is Wrong, We Don't Want To Be Lite
    Posted On: Thursday 11/1/2007
  • Fun, Fireworks, And Food Cops?
    Posted On: Thursday 6/30/2005
  • WHO Wants Your Alcohol
    Posted On: Friday 1/21/2005
  • MADD Goes Too Far
    Posted On: Friday 6/11/2004
  • Buckeyes Hop On Neo-Prohibitionist Bandwagon
    Posted On: Monday 11/24/2003
  • MEMO To MADD's New Celebrity Board
    Posted On: Wednesday 9/17/2003
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Friday 9/12/2003
  • Anti-Alcohol Foundation Is A Duck
    Posted On: Tuesday 9/9/2003


  • Activist Cash

    Mothers Against Drunk Driving
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    MADD has managed to artificially enlarge the societal problem of drunk driving by continuously expanding the parameters of the “drinking driving problem.” Even though the real drunk driving problem has been reduced to a relatively small group of incorrigible “hard-core” offenders, MADD continues to intensify its focus on responsible adults. read more here »

    OpEds

    Cinco de Mayo goes sober
    Activists in California with an anti-alcohol agenda are attempting to hijack Cinco de Mayo by making it 'dry'. read more here »

    A Tort Museum? Try a House of Horrors
    Ralph Nader believes the country is missing a major cultural institution, and he’s determined to create the American Museum of Tort Law. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.