Home / Soft Drinks / Headlines


January 7, 2004
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Pediatricians Against Fizzy Drinks

On Monday we told you how the media over-hyped a study (appearing in the journal Pediatrics) that attempted to blame childhood obesity on fast food. It turns out that the journal's publisher, the American Association of Pediatrics, announced a new anti-soft-drink policy position in the very same issue. The policy's most controversial recommendation: "Pediatricians should work to eliminate sweetened drinks in schools." This is unfortunate. In making its recommendation, the Association overlooked a great deal of scientific research demonstrating the lack of any connection between obesity and soda consumption.

A recent study in the International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition found that children's weight was not associated with the consumption of non-diet soda. The study's authors wrote:

This analysis refutes widespread speculation that carbonated soft drinks are responsible for the increase in overweight among children and adolescents ... [P]olicies aimed at curtailing consumption of carbonated soft drinks and fruit drinks/ades are impermanent solutions that will fail to coerce children and adolescents, in particular, to reject soft drinks.
A study by Georgetown University researchers found that overweight children consumed, on average, about a shot-glass more soda per day than children of normal weight. That amounts to 30 calories -- the same number that's in a carrot. And there is no evidence that banning soda in schools reduces children's overall soda consumption anyway. Kids can easily bring soda from home, or leave school grounds to buy a can. And as we've pointed out before, the research that purports to back soda bans in schools is deeply flawed.

Maintaining a healthy weight follows a simple formula: "calories in" should equal "calories out." Even if we were to exclusively focus on the calories-in side, there's no reason to single out soda as a culprit -- especially considering that a can of soda contains fewer calories than an equivalent amount of many fruit juices.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • A Not-So-Sweet Marketing Gimmick
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • Just “Say No” to Bogus Health Tips
    Posted On: Monday 11/16/2009
  • OJ with Breakfast? Repent!
    Posted On: Monday 11/9/2009
  • Soda Scam Goes Hollywood
    Posted On: Friday 11/6/2009
  • Crushing Beverage Tax Proposals
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/27/2009
  • The Empire State Strikes Back?
    Posted On: Wednesday 10/21/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009
  • Food Cops’ Obesity Message is Off-Key
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/13/2009
  • Start Spreadin’ the News: No New Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Thursday 10/8/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »

    Fat chance food cops will simply let us be
    If you’re planning on visiting New York City anytime soon, you’ll be treated to sordid subway pictures of soft drinks turning into yellow globs of human fat. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.