Home / Soft Drinks / Headlines


November 19, 2004
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


'Dense' Soda Jerks Push Misleading Pop Boycott

Yesterday was declared "National No Soda Day" by an activist organization called the American Medical Student Association (AMSA) -- presently unaffiliated with the American Medical Association. The group argued that people should cut soda "out of their diets," and urged medical students around the nation to drop their cans and preach to the rest of us. The only problem for AMSA: its anti-soda statements, and the research that supposedly backs them up, are nothing more than fizz.

In a "frequently asked questions" section of AMSA's website, the group notes that soda is just the first step in its anti-food-choice crusade. Responding to the question "Why are you picking on soda?" AMSA states:

Obesity is caused by many factors. We choose one. We have to start somewhere. There are good data on the relation between soda and adverse health affects. There are more years for more "No (fill in your favorite food)" Days.

The "good" evidence AMSA relies on comes from dubious research we've debunked before, originating with Steven Gortmaker, David Ludwig and the other "Fizzy Five" anti-soda researchers, as well as one ridiculous study that followed only 21 subjects. The group also recycles the term "liquid candy," coined by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), which deftly employed statistical malpractice to fuel its anti-soda report of the same name.

Donning a white coat and stethoscope and offering medical advice way above his pay grade, AMSA spokesman Lenny Lesser complained on the Fox News Channel yesterday about the supposedly "high caloric density of a liquid sugar beverage." That statement falls flat. As Good Housekeeping explains, "To calculate the energy density of a food, divide the calories per serving by its weight in grams. A low ED is under 1.5, while a high one is over 4.0." For the record, a regular cola has an energy density of only 1.8 -- the same as 1% milk or orange juice -- while yogurt has an energy density of 4.2. But you don't find anti-obesity activists clamoring for a ban on yogurt. Yet Lenny the Activist Med Student didn't hesitate to use this false claim to scare viewers.

AMSA's attack on soda follows previous forays into areas such as "environmental justice" and "Green hospitals." The organization, which wields a substantial $3 million annual budget, was started in 1950 under the auspices of the American Medical Association. Just ten years later, the group spun off and "refocused its energies" into activism. Some final causes taken on by AMSA's oh-so-serious members, who resemble a fraternity more than a medical group: "Med students love to party, bike for democracy, and meet up with other young folks organizing for change!"

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • A Not-So-Sweet Marketing Gimmick
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • Just “Say No” to Bogus Health Tips
    Posted On: Monday 11/16/2009
  • OJ with Breakfast? Repent!
    Posted On: Monday 11/9/2009
  • Soda Scam Goes Hollywood
    Posted On: Friday 11/6/2009
  • Crushing Beverage Tax Proposals
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/27/2009
  • The Empire State Strikes Back?
    Posted On: Wednesday 10/21/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009
  • Food Cops’ Obesity Message is Off-Key
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/13/2009
  • Start Spreadin’ the News: No New Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Thursday 10/8/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »

    Fat chance food cops will simply let us be
    If you’re planning on visiting New York City anytime soon, you’ll be treated to sordid subway pictures of soft drinks turning into yellow globs of human fat. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.