| More
Home / Soft Drinks / Headlines


September 21, 2005
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Soda Bans Flattened By Science

Last week, at a summit featuring such noted nutrition experts as SpongeBob SquarePants and Jared the Subway sandwich guy, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that forbids public schools from selling sodas. Commenting on the move, Dr. William Dietz, director of the division of nutrition and physical activity for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, noted in response: "the evidence that control of soft-drink intake is effective against obesity is pretty limited but logical, since it accounts for a lot of calories." But if it's so logical, why is there so little evidence? And why is the Governor terminating diet sodas, too? After all, they account for zero calories.

Whatever Dietz's logic may tell him, extensive scientific evidence shows that soda does not meaningfully contribute to childhood obesity, but a lack of physical activity does. Here, here, and here are discussions of studies demonstrating that soda is not a contributor to obesity in kids. Here, here, and here are information on studies highlighting the overwhelming importance of physical activity. Dietz himself recognized this point in his own testimony before Congress in 2002, saying: "Physical activity represents our most effective strategy for obesity and the one for which the most substantial body of evidence exists."

More low-fat icing on the cake was provided just last week by the Canadian Medical Association Journal, which published a study driving home both of these essential facts. The study's authors wrote: "Children from schools with and without sales of soft drinks consumed an average of 33.5 and 32.5 [grams] of sucrose per day respectively." That extra gram of sucrose accounts for four calories -- or the equivalent of two peanuts.

Not surprisingly, the study found that soda in schools was "not associated with significantly increased risks of overweight." The amount of soda schoolchildren typically consume "were likely insufficient to bring about differences in body weight." Furthermore, children in schools "with more frequent physical education classes were increasingly more likely to have normal body weight." In the authors' opinion, the connection between obesity levels and frequency of PE classes was "striking."

The California soda ban is yet another example of food cops legislating first and asking questions later. The Los Angeles Times reports that State Senator Martha Escutia (D-Montebello), who sponsored the anti-pop legislation, "said she might look into tweaking" her work. According to the Times, Escutia "can't turn a blind eye" to other scourges, such as juice.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Momentum Builds Against Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Thursday 3/18/2010
  • Critics Sound Off Against Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Monday 3/8/2010
  • Food Cops Prepare for Round 2
    Posted On: Wednesday 3/3/2010
  • The Golden State Soda Tax
    Posted On: Friday 2/19/2010
  • A Stimulus for Food Cops' Appetites
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/17/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    Obesity activists a public health threat
    Did you know your soda is a public health menace? read more here »

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.