Home / Snacks / Headlines


March 23, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Cupcakes Under Siege

The crack in the Liberty Bell just got a little wider. The Philadelphia Inquirer reported today that many of the region's elementary schools are tightening the noose on cupcakes and other treats at birthday parties and other special occasions. Presumably, without these efforts schools would fatten up children until they are fit only to appear on The Biggest Loser (Junior Edition). The Inquirer reports one local food cop's justification: "There are a million ways to celebrate that don't have to include cupcakes." What The Inquirer didn't report is that hundreds of thousands of those ways are lame.

Predictably, the article features Margo Wootan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, previously seen dropping the hammer on cupcakes around the nation's capital. Wootan complained that food in the classroom has "gotten out of control," apparently ignorant of the fact that kids weren't exactly eating birthday carrots twenty years ago. "We don't want to sound like the cupcake police," Wootan continued, "but let's be reasonable." Of course CSPI doesn't want to sound like the cupcake police -- if people realized that's what they are, it would limit their ability to police cupcakes.

A story in yesterday's Wisconsin State Journal brings out a few voices of moderation to balance out this rather silly debate. Speaking in opposition to a proposed candy ban in his school district, the head of a parent-teacher organization told the Journal: "You can't legislate responsibility." The Journal also unearthed a gem in speaking to Addrena Squires, who runs the student store at Hamilton Middle School in Madison:

The kids don't eat it every day and you have to have something sweet every once in a while. . . . I know kids have to watch their weight, but to deprive them of candy, chips and gum, I think, is outrageous.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • A Not-So-Sweet Marketing Gimmick
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • A Godzilla of Corny Hype
    Posted On: Thursday 11/19/2009
  • Toss Out the Myths With the Embalming Fluid
    Posted On: Wednesday 11/18/2009
  • Crushing Beverage Tax Proposals
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/27/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009
  • Food Cops’ Obesity Message is Off-Key
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/13/2009
  • Doubling Down on L.A. Zoning Bans
    Posted On: Monday 10/12/2009
  • Super Sized Swindle
    Posted On: Monday 10/5/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Kelly Brownell
    Background
    Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

    OpEds

    Small choices and big bodies
    Deciding whether to walk or drive is just as important as the decision to go back for second helpings. read more here »

    Diet isn't the only answer
    A quick inventory of our homes and offices provides more insight into our weight woes than any nutrition survey. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.