Home / Soft Drinks / Headlines


March 29, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Fighting Bans In The Name Of Personal Responsibility

This week we caught wind of a battle emerging in California that has made-for-TV-movie written all over it. In it, a ragtag band of high schools students -- led by the affable Rocky Slaughter (who would of course be played by washed-up C-list PETA celeb Edward Furlong) -- grapples with the unstoppable robotic power of the state's governor. You might think we're laying out the plot of Terminator 4: Let's Fight Some More Robots, but we're not -- a very real battle for the right to drink soda is unfolding in California.

Last year we covered the state's new and ill-founded ban on sodas in public schools, driven by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Rocky Slaughter and his Student Union of California (impressive names both) have launched a campaign to allow schools to devote up to half their vending machine space to soft drinks.

"I hope he enjoys his civics lesson," cracked state Senator Martha Escutia, the author of the original ban. If that's all it is, Slaughter is certainly getting one heck of a civics lesson, including an interview on national television last night. MSNBC's Tucker Carlson brought Slaughter on The Situation to talk about his campaign:

CARLSON: Banning soda is a stupid idea. But you have taken to the streets on behalf of Mr. Pibb. Why have you done that?

SLAUGHTER: ... the point that we're trying to clear up is that we're not for soda; we are against the soda ban. Because we actually believe that any time you put a ban on anything, it's not going to be effective in fixing the problem. And the problem that they cited was the childhood obesity problem that's going on in California high schools. And by placing this ban on them, they're only masking the obesity problem and not trying to fix it.

In an op-ed published February 14th in the Redding Record Searchlight, Slaughter displays some further common sense:

One universally accepted method of fighting obesity is engaging in physical fitness programs. In this regard, the current ban has caused drastic cuts in revenue for athletic programs. This loss of revenue, which directly indicates fewer drink sales, is particularly perplexing since we cannot assume that students have become less thirsty as a result of the ban ... Obesity does not crawl out the window with a change in drink choice. A 100-calorie "super healthy" drink will still build fat like a 100-calorie "illegal soda" if lifestyle habits remain the same.

To arm this young resistance fighter with some more facts, we've sent him a copy of our report, "Why Soda Bans Don't Fight Childhood Obesity." To learn where he's coming from, download it for yourself today!

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • A Not-So-Sweet Marketing Gimmick
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • Just “Say No” to Bogus Health Tips
    Posted On: Monday 11/16/2009
  • OJ with Breakfast? Repent!
    Posted On: Monday 11/9/2009
  • Soda Scam Goes Hollywood
    Posted On: Friday 11/6/2009
  • Crushing Beverage Tax Proposals
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/27/2009
  • The Empire State Strikes Back?
    Posted On: Wednesday 10/21/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009
  • Food Cops’ Obesity Message is Off-Key
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/13/2009
  • Start Spreadin’ the News: No New Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Thursday 10/8/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »

    Fat chance food cops will simply let us be
    If you’re planning on visiting New York City anytime soon, you’ll be treated to sordid subway pictures of soft drinks turning into yellow globs of human fat. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.