| More
Home / Big Fat Lies / Headlines


April 16, 2007
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Bill Clinton Brandishes Obesity Myths

Bill Clinton Brandishes Obesity Myths

Over the last six months former President Bill Clinton has transformed himself into one of the nation's most vocal anti-obesity crusaders. Given Clinton's prominence and influence, it's too bad that his calls to action are basically a rehashing of the shoddy science and blame-business-first talking points that have been dutifully employed by obesity scaremongers for years. Case in point: Clinton's speech last Sunday at the National School Boards Association (NSBA) annual conference, during which he warned that the nation's escalating rates of childhood obesity will trigger "a calamitous crisis in health" if left unaddressed.

The most egregiously unscientific line of the speech came when Clinton asserted that this is "the first generation [of] children (who will) live shorter lives than their parents." That claim was originated by Dr. William Klish in 2002, when he told the Houston Chronicle that "if we don't get this epidemic [of childhood obesity] in check, for the first time in a century children will be looking forward to a shorter life expectancy than their parents." Klish has since admitted that his prediction does not come from "evidence-based research."

And the one study that appears to justify Klish's assertion relies on the "collective judgment" of researchers, rather than empirical, scientific evidence. In fact, one of the study's co-authors has described their estimates as "just back-of-the-envelope, plausible scenarios. We never meant for them to be portrayed as precise." (For more, check out our thorough debunking of the shorter lifespan myth at ObesityMyths.com).

Clinton also singled out trans fats as a culinary culprit of kids' expanding waistlines, even though the much-maligned ingredient is a very minor contributor to the overall calorie count of foods.

It shouldn't come as a surprise that Clinton's proposed solutions to the "obesity crisis" include all sorts of invasive and expensive government programs. You wouldn't expect someone who famously stopped for a hamburger midway through a jog -- and who bought ice cream during a "heart walk" the day before the NSBA speech -- to have much confidence in consumer choice and personal responsibility.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Hype Masters Call Out Corn Syrup Falsehoods
    Posted On: Thursday 3/11/2010
  • BMI Surveillance: Another Flabby Idea
    Posted On: Thursday 3/4/2010
  • The Golden State Soda Tax
    Posted On: Friday 2/19/2010
  • The Latest Roundup on Roundness
    Posted On: Tuesday 1/12/2010
  • Addicted to Blame
    Posted On: Friday 1/8/2010
  • Back to Make-Believe with Dr. Oz
    Posted On: Wednesday 1/6/2010
  • Fructose Facts Finally Found?
    Posted On: Friday 12/18/2009
  • Grinching Our Diets
    Posted On: Thursday 12/17/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    OpEds

    Eat well, but don't skip your exercise
    Unsuccessful dieters and overzealous policymakers might consider that they might have been focusing on the wrong side of the weight-loss equation. read more here »

    Lack of exercise is the problem
    State-by-state obesity trends make more sense when you look at the other side of the obesity equation — physical activity. Simply put, residents of states with high obesity rates tend to move less. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.