| More
Home / Seafood / Headlines


September 27, 2007
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Collateral Damage From The Great Mercury Scare

Collateral Damage From The Great Mercury Scare

Many Americans senselessly fear harmless traces of mercury in the fish they eat, but the flip side of the Great Mercury Scare has been the presence of thimerosal (a preservative that contains mercury) in some children’s vaccines. In landmark research appearing in today’s New England Journal of Medicine, researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that mercury in vaccines has no effect whatsoever on children’s brain functioning.

This episode is one of the most interesting failures of the omnipresent “Precautionary Principle.” Countless parents actually stopped having their kids vaccinated, believing that health risks related to mercury (including autism, a claim trumpeted repeatedly by über environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr.) were worth avoiding at all costs. Those costs, however, included the very real risk of being hospitalized (or dying) from the flu or some other avoidable infection.

In a New England Journal of Medicine opinion piece today, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infectious Diseases chief Dr. Paul Offit writes: 

Although the precautionary principle assumes that there is no harm in exercising caution, the alarm caused by the removal of thimerosal from vaccines has been quite harmful … the thimerosal controversy should stand as a cautionary tale of how not to communicate theoretical risks to the public; otherwise, the lesson inherent in the collateral damage caused by its precipitous removal will remain unlearned.

It’s worth remembering that there has been similar “collateral damage” in our irrational (mercury-related) fear of fish. Americans who go cold-turkey on tuna and other seafood risk losing the health benefits of Omega-3 fatty acids. And since evidence keeps pouring in that these very real health benefits far outweigh the theoretical risks from mercury (see here, here, here, here, and here), adding the Precautionary Principle to our dinner plates looks like a risk not worth taking.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • TIME Trawls for Tuna Terror
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/24/2010
  • Fishy Trade Maneuvers
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/3/2010
  • Don't Have a Cow, Vegans
    Posted On: Tuesday 11/24/2009
  • Will PETA Protest Itself?
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • CSPI’s Latest Dietary Flip-Flop
    Posted On: Thursday 10/15/2009
  • Jeremy Piven, Back On the Hook
    Posted On: Thursday 10/1/2009
  • Gutting Fishy Scaremongering
    Posted On: Thursday 7/30/2009
  • New Online Seafood Calculator is a Hit
    Posted On: Monday 7/13/2009


  • Activist Cash

    SeaWeb
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    What can you say about a group of alarmist publicity-seekers whose greatest passion is “saving” fish species that aren’t even endangered? Sadly, SeaWeb is just one in a long line of recent entrants into the food-scare industry. read more here »

    Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    Though self-named a “Conservation Society,” Sea Shepherd is a violent organization. “We’re not a protest organization, we’re a policing organization,” Paul Watson has said of his organization, however its purpose is to ram and sink ships making it more of a pirate crew. read more here »

    OpEds

    Fishy Omega-3 risks
    If the FDA's report becomes official policy, the conventional wisdom urging women of childbearing age to eat less fish will be turned completely upside-down. read more here »

    Poor Children Suffer From Tuna Fears
    Seafood warnings are hurting, not helping, America’s most vulnerable kids. Sad? Yes. Shameful? Absolutely. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.