Home / Seafood / Headlines


October 30, 2007
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Genesis of a Fish Story

Genesis of a Fish Story

How on earth could USA Today have gotten something so wrong? In a front-page “cover story” this morning about fish and mercury, the newspaper fell hook-line-and-sinker for the number one myth about seafood and health:

As many as 600,000 babies may be born in the USA each year with irreversible brain damage because pregnant mothers ate mercury-contaminated fish, the Environmental Protection Agency says.

Wrong. Not even close to being right.

Kathryn Mahaffey, a single Environmental Protection Agency scientist, created this outrageous statistic in 2004 on her own. She estimated how many children would be born each year to U.S. women whose mercury levels exceed the EPA’s “Reference Dose” for mercury. (See the slide at the top of page 5.)

Mahaffey helped to develop this EPA Reference Dose herself. So she should know that it’s set ten times lower than the amount of mercury studies indicate might cause the most minimal health risk. The actual "danger level" is ten times higher. Got it? Good.

Mahaffey’s creative number-crunching wasn’t part of any official EPA statement, and the agency hasn’t publicly supported it. In fact, the activist now precedes her public speeches with a disclaimer noting that she’s not speaking for her federal-government employer.

Almost as unforgivable: USA Today wasted a few column-inches talking to San Francisco doctor-slash-activist Jane Hightower, who continues to claim that the EPA Reference Dose of 5.8 parts-per-million in human blood is a “safety” threshold. It’s not. Again, the safety threshold is ten times higher.

They do lots of things differently on the west coast. Maybe counting is one of them.

For more information about Mahaffey, Hightower, and their willing accomplices in today’s environmental movement, check out www.MercuryFacts.org.

 

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Will PETA Protest Itself?
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • CSPI’s Latest Dietary Flip-Flop
    Posted On: Thursday 10/15/2009
  • Jeremy Piven, Back On the Hook
    Posted On: Thursday 10/1/2009
  • Gutting Fishy Scaremongering
    Posted On: Thursday 7/30/2009
  • New Online Seafood Calculator is a Hit
    Posted On: Monday 7/13/2009
  • How Much Fish For Health? We’ll Tell You.
    Posted On: Thursday 7/9/2009
  • Mercury in Fish: Not So Scary After All
    Posted On: Tuesday 6/23/2009


  • Activist Cash

    SeaWeb
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    What can you say about a group of alarmist publicity-seekers whose greatest passion is “saving” fish species that aren’t even endangered? Sadly, SeaWeb is just one in a long line of recent entrants into the food-scare industry. read more here »

    Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    Though self-named a “Conservation Society,” Sea Shepherd is a violent organization. “We’re not a protest organization, we’re a policing organization,” Paul Watson has said of his organization, however its purpose is to ram and sink ships making it more of a pirate crew. read more here »

    OpEds

    Fishy Omega-3 risks
    If the FDA's report becomes official policy, the conventional wisdom urging women of childbearing age to eat less fish will be turned completely upside-down. read more here »

    Poor Children Suffer From Tuna Fears
    Seafood warnings are hurting, not helping, America’s most vulnerable kids. Sad? Yes. Shameful? Absolutely. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.