Home / Big Fat Lies / Headlines


March 25, 2008
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Promoting Government (And Vanity) As Obesity Solution

Promoting Government (And Vanity) As Obesity Solution

People whose livelihoods are rooted in the weight-loss industry have a vested interest in perpetuating obesity hype. Case in point: This morning, USA Today featured an op-ed on that very topic by David Zinczenko, editor of Men's Health magazine and author of numerous diet books. Zinczenko's piece is a prime example of food cop propaganda. Not only does he liken our love handles to assault rifles, but he also paints menu-labeling legislation as some sort of overweight antidote.

Like other nutrition fanatics, Zinczenko levels some big accusations and makes lofty promises, with little evidence to back them up.

For instance, his claim that “a whopping 35% of our weekly caloric intake is consumed in restaurants” is just plain wrong. According to reports from the USDA, thirty five percent of our calories are consumed “away from home,” a figure that includes more than just restaurants. It also covers calories from school lunches, vending machines, residential dining halls, soup kitchens, shelters, meals on wheels, and other public places. When you strip away all of those sources, restaurants actually only count for eight percent of our caloric intake -- a mere 163 calories.

After overestimating dietary statistics, Zinczenko then underestimates our nation’s IQ. He lists the calorie-counts for dishes like French fries and macaroni and cheese, claiming that “the typical American has no way to tell just how unhealthful these choices are.” (What? Of course we do.) If common sense doesn’t give it away, most consumers can figure out the relative “health” of these items same way Zinczenko did -- by checking out the nutritional breakdown already provided by most restaurants.

Menu labeling is an unproven measure that targets only a tiny fraction of our food intake. And many health experts fear that government-mandated calorie counts and other anti-obesity policies may be doing more harm than good. Last month, the London Times addressed this very issue in its educational supplement:

Organizations specializing in eating disorders worry that the focus on young people’s weight—and the way some adults demonize certain foods—is creating a generation obsessed with growing fat and increasingly guilty about eating.

In an Albany Times-Union interview last week, Zinczenko provided his thoughts on the growing number of teenagers harboring unhealthy obsessions with their bodies: “Let’s not treat vanity like a deadly sin. A little more vanity would save a lot more lives.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Soda Scam Goes Hollywood
    Posted On: Friday 11/6/2009
  • Lawyer Math: 1 + 1 = Prop. 65
    Posted On: Monday 11/2/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/20/2009
  • More Syrupy Pseudo-Science
    Posted On: Monday 10/19/2009
  • Another Big Sham in the Big Apple
    Posted On: Friday 10/16/2009
  • CSPI’s Latest Dietary Flip-Flop
    Posted On: Thursday 10/15/2009
  • Food Cops’ Obesity Message is Off-Key
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/13/2009
  • Doubling Down on L.A. Zoning Bans
    Posted On: Monday 10/12/2009
  • Labeling a Failure
    Posted On: Friday 10/9/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    OpEds

    Eat well, but don't skip your exercise
    Unsuccessful dieters and overzealous policymakers might consider that they might have been focusing on the wrong side of the weight-loss equation. read more here »

    Lack of exercise is the problem
    State-by-state obesity trends make more sense when you look at the other side of the obesity equation — physical activity. Simply put, residents of states with high obesity rates tend to move less. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.