| More
Home / Food Police / Headlines


July 2, 2008
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Menu Labeling: A Matter Of Freedom

Menu Labeling: A Matter Of Freedom

Today the popular online magazine Slate rightly identified mandatory menu labeling as “the latest salvo in a war that local governments are fighting against Americans’ diets,” also noting a few other dietary casualties of bureaucratic overreach (foie gras, a French cooking technique called “sous-vide,” trans fats, etc.). After reviewing all of the “facts*on this diet-by-guilt approach to public health, the article concluded with a critical point:

Lost in the debate over Big Macs and cheesecake has been any serious consideration of whether government agencies ought to be responsible for influencing how many calories we eat. 

This is a question all too familiar to many people in Britain.  

This week, Daily Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn protested the latest maneuver by “condiment Nazis” in local governments: confiscation of salt shakers with more than five holes. This forcible repossession is part of lawmakers’ lofty plan to “save lives” through salt reduction. Littlejohn sees it differently, describing the move as officials “finding new ruses to interfere in our lives and inventing exciting schemes for monitoring, regulating, taxing, fining, punishing and spying on us.”

Ditto.

Here’s the bottom line: Individuals are capable of making their own decisions about health, risk, and even the number of holes in their condiment dispensers. Along those lines, we also should be able to freely choose whether or not we want glaring calorie reminders of everything we eat, from our morning coffee to a steak dinner.

* Adding to the ever-growing list of fiction passed off as fact, Kelly Brownell, grandfather of the Twinkie tax, added his voice (and little else) to Slate’s menu labeling debate, claiming that Americans “eat about half their calories outside the home.” Baloney! According to the most recent federal government data, the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals, Americans consume 66 percent of our calories at home. Only eight percent come from restaurants and 12 percent from “fast food.” Even a person with mediocre math skills can tell that’s not “about half.”

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Taxing “Junk Food” Is Trashy Policy
    Posted On: Tuesday 3/16/2010
  • Hype Masters Call Out Corn Syrup Falsehoods
    Posted On: Thursday 3/11/2010
  • Food Cops Prepare for Round 2
    Posted On: Wednesday 3/3/2010
  • A Stimulus for Food Cops' Appetites
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/17/2010
  • The White House: Food Police Headquarters?
    Posted On: Friday 2/12/2010
  • Personal Responsibility Still Ahead?
    Posted On: Thursday 2/11/2010
  • CSPI: Kings of Gripe
    Posted On: Tuesday 2/9/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Kelly Brownell
    Background
    Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    ‘Tis not the season to be annoyingly wary
    This time of year, people watching their weight while facing down holiday happy hours and open houses can be particularly susceptible to scaremongering by the fat police. read more here »

    High-sodium food fight
    It doesn't take a Ph.D. in nutrition to know that a pile of pancakes, sausage, bacon and eggs is not a healthy breakfast. Except, apparently, when it comes to the nutritionists at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.