Home / Animal Rights / Headlines


March 19, 2009
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Anti-Meat Propaganda Could Be Hurting Babies' Health

Anti-Meat Propaganda Could Be Hurting Babies' Health

If you’ve ever wondered what harm could come from letting animal-rights activists play doctor, pay attention. At least one deceptive anti-meat group is encouraging pregnant women to go vegan, despite new evidence that it could increase their babies’ risk of serious birth defects.

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), as we’ve been pointing out for some time, is a save-the-chickens activist group whose actual physician membership is less than four percent. You may know PCRM from its efforts to convince Americans that going vegan will bring health benefits including cancer prevention, despite mounting evidence to the contrary. But PCRM’s latest promise to vegan moms-to-be is a future health payoff they may never collect.

According to a study in this month’s issue of the journal Pediatrics, women with low levels of vitamin B12 (an essential vitamin found in meat, eggs, and milk) when they become pregnant are at greater risk of having a child with potentially fatal birth defects.

How did PCRM react to this news? It put out a press release titled: Doctors endorse vegan and vegetarian diets for healthy pregnancies:

“Women who follow vegan diets not only have healthy pregnancies, they are often healthier than moms who consume meat,” says Susan Levin, M.S., R.D., staff dietitian with PCRM.

Sure -- the moms might be healthy. But it's their babies who could wind up with birth defects.

We've said it before, and it bears repeating: Eliminating animal protein from your diet is a lifestyle choice and, for adults, it's just as legitimate as a meat-heavy diet. You can be a vegetarian, a Unitarian, or Libertarian, and that's okay. If you're a grown-up, it's your choice.

But countless activist campaigns have encouraged us to "think of the children" -- including several campaigns from PCRM. Would it be too much to ask the group of faux mainstream medical experts to follow their own laughable advice, just once?

 

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Will PETA Protest Itself?
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • Sucker, Can You Spare a Dime (for HSUS)?
    Posted On: Tuesday 11/17/2009
  • Exposing the Animal Rights Agenda
    Posted On: Friday 11/13/2009
  • The Bacon Beckoning
    Posted On: Thursday 11/12/2009
  • Vegetarian Book Makes Meatless Arguments
    Posted On: Thursday 11/5/2009
  • Marley and Meat
    Posted On: Tuesday 11/3/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Friday 10/30/2009
  • “Physicians Committee” Abuses the Law. Again.
    Posted On: Thursday 10/29/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

    OpEds

    Hard-boiled animal activists could threaten vaccine supply
    In the post-9/11 world, the phrase "national security" conjures up images of dirty bombs, jihadists, white powder and biohazard labels. It should also bring to mind another picture: an egg. read more here »

    Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
    PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.