| More
Home / Soft Drinks / Headlines


September 9, 2009
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Commander in Chief (of Vending Machines)

Commander in Chief (of Vending Machines)

According to a national poll we commissioned last week from the Opinion Research Corporation, Americans don’t want more taxes on their soda. Two-thirds of Americans disagreed with the proposal that soda should carry extra taxes to discourage its consumption. And over 70 percent oppose such taxes on high-calorie foods, with half of respondents strongly disapproving.

Our poll couldn’t be more timely. Congress came back into session yesterday, and with the issue of how to pay to for health care reform looming large, we didn’t have to wait long to see the presumed-dead soda tax proposal have new fizz added to it. In an interview to be published next week in Men’s Health, President Obama states his opinion that government should consider a national soda tax:

I actually think it’s an idea that we should be exploring. There’s no doubt that our kids drink way too much soda. And every study that’s been done about obesity shows that there is as high a correlation between increased soda consumption and obesity as just about anything else.

One problem: That’s just not true. A steady supply of academic research has demonstrated that soda isn’t the cause of America’s rise in obesity rates. That’s a big reason that further research found soda taxes would not significantly reduce weight.

In his interview, Obama will assure readers that despite people’s fears of “Big Brother” meddling, reducing soda consumption would be good for impacting people’s health. But we’re telling readers of the New York Daily News that such assurances don’t cut it:

The tax code should not be used as a method for social engineering, and that's what this is. It smacks of the regulation that government imposed on tobacco, but soda is not tobacco.

Here’s a news flash to the President: Soda taxes have already been explored, and we learned something important. They don’t work.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Momentum Builds Against Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Thursday 3/18/2010
  • Critics Sound Off Against Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Monday 3/8/2010
  • Food Cops Prepare for Round 2
    Posted On: Wednesday 3/3/2010
  • The Golden State Soda Tax
    Posted On: Friday 2/19/2010
  • A Stimulus for Food Cops' Appetites
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/17/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    Obesity activists a public health threat
    Did you know your soda is a public health menace? read more here »

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.