Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Snacks / Headlines

May 13, 2003
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Next On The Chopping Block: Circus Peanuts, Graham Crackers, and Marshmallow Peeps

"If you thought the real dangers to children's health were smoking, drugs or drunk driving," opines The Wall Street Journal this morning, "you are clearly old-fashioned. The new threat is from Oreo cookies ... Apparently Americans aren't clever enough to figure out for themselves that cookies aren't as healthy as broccoli."

A threat from Oreos? Yesterday, The San Francisco Chronicle first reported that a California lawyer has sued Kraft, the maker of Nabisco products, in the hopes of permanently banning the sale of those crunchy, creamy goodies to Californians under 21 years of age.

As Austin Powers' Doctor Evil might say: "R-r-r-r-r-i-i-i-i-g-g-h-t."

Attorney Stephen Joseph's first claim is that Oreos' "trans fats" -- the by-products of turning cooking oils into a room-temperature solid -- are nasty molecules that smart people just shouldn't eat. Or, as one Charleston (SC) columnist put it this morning, "the stuff that makes them good is dangerous."

Last July the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine (IOM) thrust trans fats into the public debate with a critical report. True to form, the dietary scolds at the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) responded with renewed demands for trans-fat food labels, which will soon arrive on your grocery shelves.

Since IOM issued its 2002 findings, more than 14,000 news stories have been written about trans fats, making Mr. Joseph's second claim -- that "very few people know about it" -- less than believable.

Trans fats only make up 2 to 4 percent of our calorie intake. What's so terrible about them anyway? Just one thing: they elevate levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), the so-called "bad cholesterol" in the human bloodstream. But this is where the science ends and the speculation begins.

Increased LDL, nutrition nannies insist, can lead to heart disease. But the scientific evidence doesn't bear that out. In fact, the largest and most ambitious study of coronary health ever conducted (the famed Framingham Heart Study) found that the opposite is true for people over 47 years old -- the age group usually considered most "at risk" for cholesterol-related illnesses. And as early as 1981, scientists were finding that LDL cholesterol appears to protect women from strokes and other non-coronary causes of death.

Which brings us back to Mr. Joseph and his attempt to ban baked goods from polite society. The most common trans-fat-laden food, of course, isn't the Oreo. It's margarine. And margarine use, you may recall, increased in the U.S. over the last 40 years precisely because health activists warned us away from real butter in the first place.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Warning Labels Everywhere, And Not One Makes Sense
Posted On: Monday 8/25/2008

Suspension Over Sweets
Posted On: Wednesday 3/12/2008

Baked Good Boycott
Posted On: Wednesday 2/27/2008

Oh, How The Haughty Have Fallen
Posted On: Wednesday 1/9/2008

It's Only Natural
Posted On: Monday 1/7/2008

Pollan Gets Preachy
Posted On: Thursday 1/3/2008

Make Sure Santa Gives Gifts, Not Lawsuits
Posted On: Friday 12/21/2007

This Ban Brought To You By The Letter C
Posted On: Monday 12/17/2007

Surgeon General vs. North Pole
Posted On: Monday 12/3/2007


ActivistCash.com

Center for Science in the Public Interest
Background | Quotes | Financials
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

Kelly Brownell
Background
Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

Op-Eds

Small choices and big bodies
Deciding whether to walk or drive is just as important as the decision to go back for second helpings. read more here »

Diet isn't the only answer
A quick inventory of our homes and offices provides more insight into our weight woes than any nutrition survey. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.