Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Food Police / Headlines

September 8, 2003
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


CSPI: 100 Percent Litigious

Another day, another lawsuit based on a flawed report from the decidedly unscientific food cops at the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). "Smucker's line of 'Simply 100% Fruit' simply isn't 100 percent fruit," CSPI asserts. "In fact," the group warned last week, "Smucker's 'Strawberry Spreadable Fruit' is only 30 percent actual strawberries."

Wait a minute. It may be only 30 percent whole berries, but that doesn't mean it's not 100 percent fruit.

CSPI's crack team of scientists informs us that Smucker's Strawberry Spreadable Fruit is also made from fruit syrup, lemon juice concentrate, pectin, red grape juice concentrate and "other unspecified 'natural ingredients.'" Good work, guys. That's what's on the label's ingredients list.

Despite having done nothing to question Smucker's claim that its product is indeed 100 fruit, CSPI invited a lawsuit against the company. "Calling these spreads '100 percent fruit' is 100 percent fraudulent," CSPI implausibly claimed. To no one's surprise, Smucker's has already been sued. A lawyer in Wisconsin announced last week that he will seek class action status on behalf of the millions of grocery customers who were supposedly misled by seeing the word "fruit" and mistaking it for "strawberries."

This is just the latest in a long line of food-industry lawsuits inspired by CSPI. And the group has instigated its share of these frivolous legal actions. The day after announcing that, indeed, ice cream has fat and sugar in it, CSPI executive director Michael Jacobson and legal shark John Banzhaf warned ice cream retailers that they may be sued for not sufficiently trumpeting the nutritional content of their treats.

Before releasing its report on dietary acrylamide to the public last year, CSPI gave it to California lawyers -- lawyers who had filed over 5,000 suits in just two months under California's insane Proposition 65 law. That resulted in lawsuit notices against six major food companies and restaurants.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Food Cops Flip-Flop
Posted On: Thursday 9/4/2008

Nutrition Nannies: A Brief History
Posted On: Tuesday 9/2/2008

Quote of the Day
Posted On: Wednesday 8/20/2008

David vs. Goliath
Posted On: Tuesday 8/19/2008

Michael vs. Michael (Fitness vs. Food)
Posted On: Thursday 8/14/2008

Fitness, Fatness, And Half-Baked Schemes
Posted On: Wednesday 8/13/2008

Nutty Warning Labels (Literally)
Posted On: Tuesday 8/12/2008

Time To Ban The Bans
Posted On: Monday 8/11/2008

Road to Nanny State Paved With Bad Intentions?
Posted On: Thursday 7/31/2008


ActivistCash.com

Kelly Brownell
Background
Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

Marion Nestle
Background
Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

Op-Eds

What's on the menu? Regulation
There are ways to ensure that consumers have access to a surplus of information without having it thrust in their faces on restaurant menus. read more here »

Preserve right to eat without guilt: Don't post calories of fast-food dishes
Americans should still have a right to guilt-free eating. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.