Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Animal Rights / Headlines

October 2, 2003
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


PETA's Latest Excuse For Funding Terrorists

In 2002 the Center for Consumer Freedom first revealed that PETA had donated $1,500 of tax-exempt funds to the FBI-labeled terrorist Earth Liberation Front (ELF). Now, in a story about recent ELF arsons, the Associated Press has published the eighth in a series of different explanations PETA has offered for this misguided (and possibly illegal) cash grant.

Yesterday's AP story notes: "PETA said the money was used to send two people to Washington to testify at a congressional hearing on behalf of an ELF spokesman." Funny -- PETA officials never mentioned this in 2002, when they offered the following explanations:

1) "PETA President Ingrid Newkirk says ... that the ELF donation was for a publication (and not its illegal activities)." [The Wall Street Journal, February 22, 2002]

2) "[Newkirk] said she did not remember the check to ELF, which was reported on the organization's 2000 tax return." [ABC News, February 26, 2002]

3) "[Newkirk] also said the money PETA gave to the North American Earth Liberation Front was in response to a request for funds for educational materials." [The Associated Press, March 4, 2002]

4) "Newkirk also confirms that [PETA] donated money to the ELF for 'habitat protection.'" [KOMO-TV Seattle, March 5, 2002]

5) "PETA [said they] contributed $1,500 during the 2000 fiscal year to ELF for education and habitat protection." [The Denver Post, March 6, 2002]

6) "The only reason we did it is because it was a program that we supported. And it was about vegetarianism." [PETA communications director Lisa Lange on "The O'Reilly Factor," Fox News Channel, March 7, 2002]

7) "In April 2001, PETA sent a check in the amount of $1,500.00 to the North American Earth Liberation Front Press Office to assist Craig Rosebraugh with legal expenses related to free speech issues regarding animal protection issues." [PETA general counsel Jeff Kerr, letter to U.S. Congressman Scott McInnis, March 14, 2002]

Just to clear up a few points from PETA's many contradictory explanations: PETA's tax return for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2001 (FY2000) lists a disbursement to the "North American Earth Liberation Front." No mention was made of any "press office." And while PETA may claim to have earmarked the grant in question for any number of lawful purposes (depending on what day you ask them), the Earth Liberation Front has no "lawful, charitable, animal protection program activities." Period. In testimony before the House of Representatives last year, even long-time ELF "spokesperson" Craig Rosebraugh was unable to articulate any.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Livestock’s Shrinking (U.S.) Shadow
Posted On: Friday 10/10/2008

Hot Dog! Let's Be Frank About Animal-Rights Deception
Posted On: Wednesday 10/8/2008

Animal Rights Update: SHAC Is Back
Posted On: Tuesday 10/7/2008

It’s Cartoon Friday! (With a Twist)
Posted On: Friday 10/3/2008

Quote Of The Week
Posted On: Monday 9/22/2008

The new PETA: 'Presidential Election Thrills Anglers'?
Posted On: Wednesday 9/17/2008

Memo To The Vegan Fringe: 100-Person Studies Are A Two-Edged Sword
Posted On: Tuesday 9/16/2008

Quote of the Week -- And We’re Citing Ourselves!
Posted On: Friday 9/12/2008

Why Should Vegetarians Define 'Sustainable'?
Posted On: Wednesday 9/10/2008


ActivistCash.com

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Background | Quotes | Financials
While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Background | Quotes | Financials
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

Op-Eds

Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »

California Focus: The new animal-rights battleground
The animal-rights movement is far from harmless. And since California seems to be the current animal-rights Ground Zero, it's worth considering what the movement stands for. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.