Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Big Fat Lies / Headlines

February 28, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


BMI Report Cards: The 'F' Is For 'Futility'

While some revelers are out celebrating Mardi Gras, a few Maryland legislators are conspiring to make it a Non-Fat Tuesday. The General Assembly in Annapolis is considering legislation that would require public schools to measure their students and send home Body Mass Index (BMI) information on their report cards. The Baltimore Sun has done some fine reporting to uncover serious (and not-so-serious) reasons to oppose any such law, over and above scientific findings that cast doubt on the usefulness of the BMI in general.

The BMI report card is hardly a new idea -- Arkansas mandated the same thing in 2003. The Sun reported the results:

Parents in Arkansas did not take kindly to the fat measurements. In fact, last year state lawmakers tried to have the law repealed. According to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, during the first year of the screenings 13 percent of parents said their children had been teased at school because of the program ... More disturbing for some Arkansas officials: The BMI testing has not put a dent in the state's number of overweight kids.

Futility plus mockery sounds like a promising start for a health initiative. Since pretty much all an adult needs to assess a child's weight is one functioning eye, we suspect that it's not for lack of information that some parents aren't giving their kids the health guidance they need.

Uselessness is one thing, but the BMI report card may raise a worse specter yet, as The Sun reports:

"It further accentuates the idea that weight is of extreme importance," says Dr. Harry Brandt, director of the Center for Eating Disorders at Sheppard Pratt. He predicts that some young people would feel bad enough about their body grades to experiment with the sort of unhealthy behavior that leads to anorexia or bulimia.

The Sun goes on to recount the experience of a woman highly sensitive to this very subject:

Christine Duray, a recovering anorexic who works in the state comptroller's office, swung past a recent Senate hearing on [the BMI report card]. She didn't want to testify. The idea just worried her.

"If I was already teetering on the edge of an eating disorder, this would push me right over the edge," she says. "There's already competition enough in high school."

In the hopes that we haven't completely darkened a hearty Fat Tuesday dinner for you, consider a little parting wisdom. When one Maryland high school senior was asked by The Sun about the proposal, she said: "It's kind of like against basic human rights!"

We couldn't have put it better. The BMI report card: It's kind of like against basic human rights.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Let’s Learn from the Scandinavians!
Posted On: Monday 11/17/2008

The NFL Goes Long To Preserve Phys Ed
Posted On: Tuesday 11/11/2008

Lifestyle Changes Are The Real Obesity Culprit
Posted On: Tuesday 10/21/2008

Unsportsmanlike Conduct From British Food Cops
Posted On: Monday 10/20/2008

Obama and McCain Agree On At Least One Thing
Posted On: Thursday 10/16/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Tuesday 10/14/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Thursday 10/9/2008

The Obesity Straw Man Comes in Bright Cartoon Colors!
Posted On: Thursday 10/2/2008

Michael vs. Michael (Fitness vs. Food)
Posted On: Thursday 8/14/2008


ActivistCash.com

Center for Science in the Public Interest
Background | Quotes | Financials
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

Op-Eds

Food only part of obesity problem
The cause of obesity isn't what you think. read more here »

Leave calorie counts off the menu; Nutrition is more complex than a few figures can convey.
Although The Times’ editorial was right that "laws that protect consumers from their own unhealthful habits have more than a whiff of the nanny state about them," its support for menu labeling is wrong. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.