Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Food Scares / Headlines

September 27, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


When Bad News is Good News: The Spinach Story

The media frenzy surrounding the recent spinach-related E. coli infections has begun to die down. It's certainly a good thing that the causes, effects, and geographical origins of the illness have been well publicized, but one important insight has been lost in the shuffle. The scope of the outbreak has been relatively small -- to date, just 183 cases and one confirmed death. And while death and disease of any sort is tragic, the fact that a foodborne illness has received so much attention at all is one indicator of just how safe our food supply generally is. Despite the perpetual calls for additional federal oversight by the likes of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Americans already enjoy the safest food supply in human history -- and it's getting safer every day. As columnist Sally Squires wrote in yesterday's Washington Post:
If the recent outbreak of the E. coli infection traced to fresh spinach has left you worried about what's on your plate, breathe a little easier: Despite the recent high-profile problem, food-borne illness has been steadily declining in the United States. Today, the odds of getting sick from tainted food "are overall about a third less than they were in 1998," says Richard Raymond, undersecretary for food safety at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Noticeably, the agenda-driven group most prone to exploit food scares -- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) -- has remained mute on the issue. Whether it's linking SARS to meat consumption, warning of an impending mad-cow-induced apocalypse, hyping the impact of mercury traces in fish, or claiming that bird flu awaits all chicken eaters, PETA rarely misses the chance to exaggerate (and pontificate) about foodborne illnesses. So why haven't we heard anything about spinach from these veg-heads?

Oh, that's right -- it's because PETA's campaigns have never been, and never will be, about providing an accurate assessment of risks and benefits associated with eating one food or another. The group's magazine ads, billboards, and TV spots are meant to scare you into adopting a meatless diet. And publicizing the apparent dangers of eating vegetables won't help them much.

Taking PETA's usual tack, we've drawn up an over-the-top, far-fetched ad campaign of our own. We certainly wouldn't want this outbreak to go unexploited.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Report: Mercury-Fish Hype Put Poor Children At Risk
Posted On: Wednesday 9/3/2008

Warning Labels Everywhere, And Not One Makes Sense
Posted On: Monday 8/25/2008

California’s Silliest Law Is About To Get Sillier
Posted On: Monday 7/28/2008

Corn Sugar Off The Hook (Again)
Posted On: Wednesday 6/18/2008

Phony Health Experts Continue Seafood Smear Campaign
Posted On: Tuesday 5/13/2008

Fat Camps For 5-Year-Olds
Posted On: Monday 5/12/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Thursday 5/1/2008

TV Talking Heads Rarely Major In Math. Or Science.
Posted On: Friday 4/25/2008

Time to Eat More Fish
Posted On: Thursday 4/10/2008


ActivistCash.com

Environmental Working Group
Background | Quotes | Financials
The Environmental Working Group is the cauldron where some of the worst science and most creative smear campaigns are cooked up. A web of vested interests including both organic marketers and their public relations operatives reap the benefits of these deceptive advocacy campaigns. read more here »

Environmental Media Services
Background | Quotes | Financials
If you’ve ever been advised to steer clear of a food, beverage, or other consumer product based on the claims of a nonprofit organization, you’ve likely been “spun” by Fenton’s multi-million-dollar message machine — and Environmental Media Services (EMS) has probably been the messenger. read more here »

Op-Eds

Eating Shown to be Hazardous to Your Health
It turns out that in order to be in any real danger from acrylamide, a person of average weight would have to eat over 62 pounds of chips or 182 pounds of fries, every day, for his or her entire life. read more here »

Food Fetish
Hungry planet? Starving millions? Let them eat Peruvian Purple Potatoes! read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.