Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Trial Lawyers / Headlines

November 6, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Obesity Lawsuit Conference IV: This Time, It's Personal

The Public Health Advocacy Institute's annual litigation conference always draws the best of the nation's worst trial lawyers, academics, and activists together to compare notes on how best to clamp down on consumer choice. Last year's conference included such wisdom as "The dairy industry is going to go the way of big tobacco" and "Junk food is the gateway drug," and this year's did not disappoint. As with the last two conferences, the Center for Consumer Freedom was there to get the story.

Saturday's keynote address was given by top food scold Marion Nestle, who railed against businesses attempting to market foods on the basis of health. Eye-opening quote: "Don't market to kids. Period. ... That means no cartoons on carrots." Summarizing her nutrition rules from her lengthy tome What to Eat (which we reviewed in May), Nestle let slip a surprising endorsement of the idea that parents are responsible for what their kids eat: "If you don't want kids eating junk food, don't buy it."

On the subject of trans fat bans (as recently proposed in New York City and New Jersey), food cop extraordinaire Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest shared his personal domino theory, saying that such bans are "going to spread like wildfire." Sitting next to Jacobson, another panelist praised the virtues of 1960s-era price controls on food and floated the possibility of licensing supermarkets.

An afternoon panel entitled "The 'Choice' Mantra" featured a litany of speakers who were less than jazzed about America's cultural focus on personal free will. One panelist lamented: "What is missing is a conceptual alternative to personal responsibility." Another delighted the audience by saying: "There is a bigger problem than the obesity epidemic -- the choice epidemic." A third didn't like the term "obesity" itself, since it applies to individuals and not situations.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Chicken-Haters Grilled By California Attorney General
Posted On: Thursday 11/13/2008

Don't Get Tricked When You Hand Out Treats
Posted On: Friday 10/31/2008

Nutrition Nannies: A Brief History
Posted On: Tuesday 9/2/2008

Warning Labels Everywhere, And Not One Makes Sense
Posted On: Monday 8/25/2008

California’s Silliest Law Is About To Get Sillier
Posted On: Monday 7/28/2008

Ready For A Mocha-Java Warning Label?
Posted On: Friday 6/27/2008

Breaking News: Calorie-Count Trial Lawyers Pick Second Target
Posted On: Friday 6/6/2008

Class Action Over Calorie Counts
Posted On: Thursday 6/5/2008

Twinkies Worse Than Terrorists, Food Cop Claims
Posted On: Tuesday 2/26/2008


ActivistCash.com

John Banzhaf
Background | Quotes
Banzhaf has never met a lawsuit he didn’t like. For Banzhaf and his trial-lawyer allies, “big food” is the next tobacco-style cash cow. read more here »

Op-Eds

Turkey, stuffing, and liability wavier?
This Thanksgiving protect yourself with a "Thanksgiving Liability Indemnification Agreement" read more here »

'Obesity' lawyers licking chops
In search of their next supersized payday, lawyers know they can't sue to make people exercise more, so they're targeting food makers. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.