Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Biotechnology / Headlines

December 21, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Infected Lettuce? Blowhard Activists? Zap’em Both

Food fascists coast to coast have been quick to place the blame for this year's E.coli outbreaks on their usual public punching bags -- the federal government, "big business," and modern agriculture. Obscured in the finger-pointing frenzy is the fact that the real culprit is in the mirror.

As The Wall Street Journal noted this week, some of the activist world's biggest guns have been fighting against the one tool proven to prevent food-borne illnesses like E.coli: "The technology is known as food 'irradiation,' a process that propels gamma rays into meat, poultry and produce in order to kill most insects and bacteria." Irradiation has been certified safe and effective by a number of prominent food safety agencies, including the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control, The American Medical Association, and the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization.

Yet the FDA hasn't approved irradiation for widespread use, primarily because of a campaign run by anti-tech reactionaries like the Organic Consumers Association, Ralph Nader's Public Citizen, and the increasingly misguided Consumer Reports. Their charges ultimately amount to an incoherent collection of scare words (e.g., "unnatural," "exotic") without any scientific justification. But, hey, who needs evidence when you've got an agenda and a press release?

The Journal rightly points out that these activist all-stars have been successful at road-blocking food irradiation technology because the media hasn't held them accountable. Even now, when we're seeing the human cost to this neo-Luddite zealotry, most news stories just regurgitate activist-branded solutions, without any mention of the very technology that can make a difference:

[T]he press replays the familiar yarn that the E. coli outbreaks are caused by budget cuts and government collusion with industry. In fact, FDA spending on food safety has increased to $535 million in 2006 from $354 million in 2001, a 51% increase. In any case, such inspections and more regulations can never hope to prevent E. coli as well as irradiation does. The government couldn't possibly hire enough inspectors to track the many sources of fresh produce in the U.S.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Food-Shortage Rx: Globalization
Posted On: Tuesday 4/15/2008

Score One For Reason
Posted On: Thursday 3/20/2008

Remembering The Food Scold Days
Posted On: Friday 12/14/2007

Anti-Biotech, Techno-Illiterate
Posted On: Friday 10/26/2007

Congress Honors Norman Borlaug
Posted On: Tuesday 7/17/2007

Sometimes ‘M.D.’ Stands For 'Medical Dodo'
Posted On: Friday 7/6/2007

Irradiation (Finally) Getting Its Due; Anti-Tech Activists Incensed
Posted On: Tuesday 3/27/2007

Hey, Starbucks! I'll Take Mine De-Calf . . .
Posted On: Thursday 1/18/2007

Food Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones
Posted On: Tuesday 1/9/2007


ActivistCash.com

Greenpeace
Background | Quotes | Financials
Greenpeace founder, Patric Moore, has stated his former organization as anti-human, anti-technology, anti-science and basically anti-civilization. read more here »

Foundation on Economic Trends
Background | Quotes | Financials
The Foundation on Economic Trends is a platform for the neo-Luddite intellectual guru Jeremy Rifkin. read more here »

Op-Eds

Genetically Altered Foods are the Key to Feeding an Increasingly Hungry World
To feed an ever expanding population, the world needs foods with genetically improved componants, or famine will plague mass populations. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.