Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


The Physicians Committee's 'Heimlich Problem'

Thanks to his eponymous "maneuver," Dr. Henry Heimlich's name is among the most iconic in the medical world. He sits on the advisory board of the animal-rights Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), which named an award after him in 2005. But judging from a new broadcast of ABC's 20/20, his public credibility -- and PCRM's -- may be crumbling. With PCRM's help, the apparently publicity-starved Heimlich has been promoting his namesake choking intervention as a rescue technique for drowning. ABC blew the whistle on this potentially deadly idea on Friday night, along with a few others in Heimlich's doctor bag (including the unethical use of live malaria to treat AIDS patients). PCRM president Neal Barnard sided with the vegetarian Heimlich, and came out looking decidedly less than "responsible."

At the center of the 20/20 controversy is Heimlich's son Peter, who has spent years researching what he calls his father's "series of discredited, experimental, dubious medical theories which every medical expert says are either useless, dangerous, or crackpot." (Click here for Peter Heimlich's investigative website.) PCRM promoted one of those ideas -- using the Heimlich maneuver for drowning victims -- in a Public Service Announcement, and in a 2000 press release that's still available on the group's website.

Here's an excerpt from Friday night's 20/20 transcript:

Henry Heimlich in a PCRM ad: "Remember this: Mouth-to-mouth resuscitation is not effective when the lungs are flooded with water. The Heimlich Maneuver expels the water from the lungs."

ABC's Brian Ross: "... an idea endorsed by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, which produced this commercial, and where Dr. Heimlich sits on the advisory board."

PCRM president Neal Barnard: "If I were pulled out of a swimming pool, and I were pulseless and not breathing, I would be very appreciative if somebody would take a couple of seconds and do a Heimlich to get the water out of my lungs."

Brian Ross: "But leading experts say the theory makes no sense. According to a report by the National Academy of Sciences, most drowning victims have little or no water in their lungs. And any delay in giving artificial respiration by doing the Heimlich maneuver first could cause brain damage and death. And the report's author says the Heimlich maneuver itself can be dangerous on unconscious drowning victims."

Dr. Peter Rosen, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: "The pressure is being applied right under the rib cage, onto the liver. And it would be very, very easy -- especially in a child -- to tear the right lobe of the liver. And then the child would die of hemorrhage."

Neal Barnard's cheerful support of this potentially deadly drowning intervention indicates that PCRM won't sever its ties with the elder Heimlich any time soon. (For another indication, click here to watch PCRM advisory board member and vegan-diet hawker John McDougall praise some of Heimlich's more questionable pursuits.) But that's no surprise, since the only non-deceptive word in the name "Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine" is the short one in the middle.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


‘Humane Wayne’ Gets His
Posted On: Wednesday 7/1/2009

‘Humane Wayne’ Muddies the Airwaves
Posted On: Tuesday 6/30/2009

HSUS Shows Its True Colors
Posted On: Monday 6/22/2009

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Wednesday 6/17/2009

Save the Lab Rats! (Kill the Humans?)
Posted On: Thursday 6/4/2009

Good Newz for Michael Vick is Bad Newz for HSUS
Posted On: Wednesday 5/20/2009

Atlanta Investigation Uncovers Deceptive 'Humane Society' Agenda
Posted On: Friday 5/15/2009

Food Dogma, With a 'Nudge'
Posted On: Wednesday 5/13/2009

More Scrambled Claims From Animal Activists
Posted On: Tuesday 5/5/2009


ActivistCash.com

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Background | Quotes | Financials
While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Background | Quotes | Financials
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

Op-Eds

Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »

California Focus: The new animal-rights battleground
The animal-rights movement is far from harmless. And since California seems to be the current animal-rights Ground Zero, it's worth considering what the movement stands for. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.