Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


The Animal Research War

The Animal Research War

Our bookshelves overflow with volumes about obesity, animal welfare, crop biotechnology, seafood politics, and the latest veal saltimbocca recipes. But every once in a while, a title comes along whose importance warrants a shout from the rooftops. In The Animal Research War, Dr. Michael Conn and James Parker make a powerful case that the animal “rights” movement has declared moral bankruptcy by personally and viciously targeting medical researchers whose work requires the use of animals. It’s a compelling read. We recommend buying a copy for anyone you know who financially supports People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, the Humane Society of the United States, or any other like-minded group of radicals.

Dr. Conn writes of the first big lesson he learned about the animal rights movement:

“[S]ome animal rightists misrepresent animal research and do so with impunity. Apparently they believe that they serve a cause greater than the truth. ‘Heavenly deception’ is what some cult groups in the late 1960s called it.”

And then there’s the whole issue of violence, harassment, and intimidation. This book has got it in spades, from the point of view of the victim.

“Were my harassers terrorists? It’s your call, but remember that their actions were designed to coerce me by the threat of violence. Of course, some animal extremists might say, ‘We don’t use violence. We demonstrate and destroy property, but we never injure or kill persons.’ What are we to think of that?

“Maybe we should ask four Oregon National Primate Research Center scientists who received letters armed with razor blades set to cut the hand of the opener. Would they think of that as violence? …

“Or maybe we should ask the scientist at another university who has been warned that his children’s pictures would be put up on the Internet—they would be made hostages, in other words—until he stops research on animals. Surely he experiences this as a violent threat.”

Throughout this very readable book, Conn and Parker explore the beginnings of the animal rights movement; the histories of a few of its most radical practitioners; its cross-pollinations with the environmental movement; and the real, measurable cost it has levied on the modern world. This is a war with real casualties: careers ruined, scientific knowledge lost, lives shortened.

While we tend to focus on misguided animal activists’ food agenda, their plan to hamstring global scientific research on behalf of mice and monkeys is doubly frightening. But here's the rub: Anyone who would slow down (or even halt) progress toward AIDS and cancer cures clearly doesn’t care if we live or die—and therefore doesn’t deserve any sort of voice in what we eat or wear.

Read this book. Share it with a friend. Better yet, strike a blow for consumer freedom and buy a copy for your local library.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


It’s Cartoon Friday! (With a Twist)
Posted On: Friday 10/3/2008

Quote Of The Week
Posted On: Monday 9/22/2008

The new PETA: 'Presidential Election Thrills Anglers'?
Posted On: Wednesday 9/17/2008

Memo To The Vegan Fringe: 100-Person Studies Are A Two-Edged Sword
Posted On: Tuesday 9/16/2008

Quote of the Week -- And We’re Citing Ourselves!
Posted On: Friday 9/12/2008

Why Should Vegetarians Define 'Sustainable'?
Posted On: Wednesday 9/10/2008

Quotes of the Week: Hot Dog Pride
Posted On: Friday 9/5/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Thursday 8/28/2008

Oscar Mayer Gets Swift-Boated. Are We Listening?
Posted On: Wednesday 8/27/2008


ActivistCash.com

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Background | Quotes | Financials
While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Background | Quotes | Financials
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

Op-Eds

Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »

California Focus: The new animal-rights battleground
The animal-rights movement is far from harmless. And since California seems to be the current animal-rights Ground Zero, it's worth considering what the movement stands for. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.