Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Food Police / Headlines

July 2, 2008
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Menu Labeling: A Matter Of Freedom

Menu Labeling: A Matter Of Freedom

Today the popular online magazine Slate rightly identified mandatory menu labeling as “the latest salvo in a war that local governments are fighting against Americans’ diets,” also noting a few other dietary casualties of bureaucratic overreach (foie gras, a French cooking technique called “sous-vide,” trans fats, etc.). After reviewing all of the “facts*on this diet-by-guilt approach to public health, the article concluded with a critical point:

Lost in the debate over Big Macs and cheesecake has been any serious consideration of whether government agencies ought to be responsible for influencing how many calories we eat. 

This is a question all too familiar to many people in Britain.  

This week, Daily Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn protested the latest maneuver by “condiment Nazis” in local governments: confiscation of salt shakers with more than five holes. This forcible repossession is part of lawmakers’ lofty plan to “save lives” through salt reduction. Littlejohn sees it differently, describing the move as officials “finding new ruses to interfere in our lives and inventing exciting schemes for monitoring, regulating, taxing, fining, punishing and spying on us.”

Ditto.

Here’s the bottom line: Individuals are capable of making their own decisions about health, risk, and even the number of holes in their condiment dispensers. Along those lines, we also should be able to freely choose whether or not we want glaring calorie reminders of everything we eat, from our morning coffee to a steak dinner.

* Adding to the ever-growing list of fiction passed off as fact, Kelly Brownell, grandfather of the Twinkie tax, added his voice (and little else) to Slate’s menu labeling debate, claiming that Americans “eat about half their calories outside the home.” Baloney! According to the most recent federal government data, the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals, Americans consume 66 percent of our calories at home. Only eight percent come from restaurants and 12 percent from “fast food.” Even a person with mediocre math skills can tell that’s not “about half.”

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Food Cops Flip-Flop
Posted On: Thursday 9/4/2008

Nutrition Nannies: A Brief History
Posted On: Tuesday 9/2/2008

Quote of the Day
Posted On: Wednesday 8/20/2008

David vs. Goliath
Posted On: Tuesday 8/19/2008

Michael vs. Michael (Fitness vs. Food)
Posted On: Thursday 8/14/2008

Fitness, Fatness, And Half-Baked Schemes
Posted On: Wednesday 8/13/2008

Nutty Warning Labels (Literally)
Posted On: Tuesday 8/12/2008

Time To Ban The Bans
Posted On: Monday 8/11/2008

Road to Nanny State Paved With Bad Intentions?
Posted On: Thursday 7/31/2008


ActivistCash.com

Kelly Brownell
Background
Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

Marion Nestle
Background
Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

Op-Eds

What's on the menu? Regulation
There are ways to ensure that consumers have access to a surplus of information without having it thrust in their faces on restaurant menus. read more here »

Preserve right to eat without guilt: Don't post calories of fast-food dishes
Americans should still have a right to guilt-free eating. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.