Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Food Cops Closer To Banning Fast Food

Food Cops Closer To Banning Fast Food

 

After moving out of committee yesterday, Los Angeles’ proposed “fast food” moratorium is one step closer to becoming law. It’s worthwhile to note that L.A. County commissioned a study last year, which found “fast food” restaurants were not significantly correlated with childhood obesity. This didn’t faze the food cops. The city official who first called for the ban continues to justify the regulation on the grounds that obesity is somehow tied to any establishment that:  

For now, ignore the fact that everything from your grandmother’s kitchen to a booster club bake sale fits these vague criteria. The bigger problem is that these guidelines have nothing to do with the quality of food served. While some of the highest calorie dishes are served on non-disposable china in L.A.’s fine-dining hot spots, fast food restaurants can dole out mixed green salads and fresh fruit to plenty of hungry customers, regardless of whether they’re sitting at a table, standing at a counter, or passing by the drive-thru window.  

But none of that factors into the city’s arbitrary embargo on “fast food” -- whatever that means. The rationale is this: Bureaucrats have declared it “fattening,” and therefore, it must go. But if lawmakers are going to follow that logic, they must also push for moratoriums on other “fattening” institutions, like marriage and day care. 

There’s evidence to back that up. “Marriage definitely can be fattening,” a leading authority on nutrition explained to Australia’s Courier Mail over the weekend. Another study supported that notion, showing that falling in love translates to weight gain for more than 60 percent of women. Research released yesterday found that babies who attend day care get fatter than those who stay home. Add to that low-fat foods, pharmaceuticals, pollution, sleep deprivation, chronic stress, thermostats, and smoking; all of these factors were linked to love handles in last week’s obesity series in the Los Angeles Times. 

The fact is that almost everything in our lives has been, at one time or another, tied to our plump physiques. The truly important question is not if something influences our weight, but how much it does. And to that end, physical activity outranks the rest: marriage, day care, and even “fast food.” So tell L.A.’s food cops to take a hike. After all, it’s good for their health.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Warning Labels Everywhere, And Not One Makes Sense
Posted On: Monday 8/25/2008

Quote of the Day
Posted On: Wednesday 8/20/2008

David vs. Goliath
Posted On: Tuesday 8/19/2008

Nutty Warning Labels (Literally)
Posted On: Tuesday 8/12/2008

Time To Ban The Bans
Posted On: Monday 8/11/2008

Do The (Obesity) Math
Posted On: Thursday 8/7/2008

Road to Nanny State Paved With Bad Intentions?
Posted On: Thursday 7/31/2008

100 Percent Fat, 100 Percent False
Posted On: Wednesday 7/30/2008

California’s Silliest Law Is About To Get Sillier
Posted On: Monday 7/28/2008


Op-Eds

California Focus: The State of California contains chemicals!
Chances are good that in the past 22 years, you've seen warning labels on everyday items cautioning that you've been exposed to chemicals that the state of California has deemed dangerous. read more here »

Very Little Truth In Labeling
What's wrong with forcing restaurants to label menus in the same way food companies label a box of cereal? read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.