Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Animal Rights / Headlines

October 8, 2008
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Hot Dog! Let's Be Frank About Animal-Rights Deception

Hot Dog! Let's Be Frank About Animal-Rights Deception

Over the past few months we’ve been following the anti-hot dog smear campaign led by the Cancer Project, a pseudo-medical organization designed to further the extreme animal rights agenda of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM). Last night UPI reported that the animal rights group will petition the government tomorrow to “stop handing out hot dogs and other processed meats to the nation's children” enrolled in the National School Lunch Program. For months now, PCRM's merry band of PETA worshipers have desperately wanted us all to believe that colon cancer starts with your first wiener. But science had other plans.

The American Dietetic Association explained that “no single food or type of food is necessarily detrimental to health,” making PCRM’s hot dog fixation utterly arbitrary. Confirming this were Harvard researchers who found no association between meat intake and colon cancer. On the contrary, they found that some meat is “associated with a lower riskof colorectal cancer.” Given PCRM’s general scientific meat-headedness, if we were in the mood we could get in a few cheap shots at their expense, citing a recent Oxford University study linking a vegetarian diet with a higher risk of “brain shrinkage.” But we’ll take the higher road today.

Instead, we'll offer UPI a mild critique. The news service described PCRM as a group “which has been criticized for having links with militant animal rights activists.” Links? No, PCRM is a group of militant animal rights activists. The Cancer Project’s leader recently completed a long tenure as president of the PETA Foundation, the literal mother ship of radical animal rights activists. The Cancer Project is so militant in its animal rights advocacy that it actively discourages Americans from donating to -- can you guess? -- cancer charities because they acknowledge that some animal testing is necessary to find a cure.

Despite their comically misleading names, neither the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (now 96 percent physician-free!) nor its "Cancer Project" affiliate has anything meaningful to do with advancing the interests of people. Neal Barnard, the president of the Cancer Project, is a nonpracticing psychiatrist. Good for him. But if that makes PCRM a group of nutrition experts, our dip into a pool last month makes us contenders for the 400-meter individual medley in the 2012 Olympic Games.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Frequent Flyers Beware: Here Comes PCRM Again
Posted On: Tuesday 11/18/2008

Quote of the Week
Posted On: Monday 11/17/2008

Maybe PETA Just Wants a Monopoly On Clowns
Posted On: Friday 11/14/2008

Chicken-Haters Grilled By California Attorney General
Posted On: Thursday 11/13/2008

All Hail HSUS, King Of Egg Outsourcing!
Posted On: Wednesday 11/5/2008

Abraham Lincoln Was Not An Animal Rights Activist
Posted On: Wednesday 10/29/2008

EXCLUSIVE (Parody): Ingrid Newkirk's First "15 Questions"
Posted On: Friday 10/24/2008

Tall Tale Of The Week
Posted On: Wednesday 10/22/2008

Seven New Things You Didn’t Know
Posted On: Friday 10/17/2008


ActivistCash.com

Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Background | Quotes | Financials
While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature admits that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. read more here »

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Background | Quotes | Financials
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, human beings are just another animal species, no more special or important than a snail darter or dairy cow. read more here »

Op-Eds

Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »

California Focus: The new animal-rights battleground
The animal-rights movement is far from harmless. And since California seems to be the current animal-rights Ground Zero, it's worth considering what the movement stands for. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.