Home / Op-Eds


Posted On August 26, 2004
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Soft Drink Hysteria Hard to Swallow

By: Rick Berman
Newspaper: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Legendary TV chef Julia Child, who passed away this month, warned us that "when you're afraid of your food, you don't digest it well." Unfortunately, American consumers have been scared silly about nearly every item on the menu, from beef and chicken to salmon and veggies. The latest phony food scare centers on soft drinks and their alleged link to type 2 diabetes.

While the authors of a recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association are spinning like tops to pump up new fears, they have ignored one of their own key findings.

Their data show that soda consumption has nothing to do with diabetes in women who are not obese. And even in obese women, the authors concede that diabetes may be linked to "dietary and lifestyle changes," rather than soft drink consumption itself. Bottom line: Their sweeping anti-soda conclusions are simply not justified.

Frankly, the contortions that the authors went through to demonize soda would make our own gold medal gymnasts proud. One nutrition expert at Michigan State University called their work "statistical hocus pocus."

It's no surprise that these researchers are pushing frenzy over facts. Many of the study's authors boast an extensive history of anti-soda activism. Several have close ties to the self-described "food police" at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which says it's "proud about finding something wrong with practically everything."

One of the authors sits on CSPI's scientific advisory board. Another signed a CSPI letter condemning sugar consumption — six years ago. This week he made the outlandish assertion that you should never drink any soda.

Back in 1994, Child warned that CSPI sounded "the death knell of gastronomy" and was "poisoning people's pleasure." That's the real result of these misleading and overhyped food scare studies. And this anti-soda report is just the latest example of a small band of dietary Puritans in lab coats trying to impose their diets on the rest of us.

While taking biased research with an enormous grain of salt, Child counseled that "People need to take an adult point of view. We know what we need to do: eat in moderation, small helpings, a great variety, weight-watching, moderate exercise and have fun." Now there's some health advice worth its salt, from a woman who lived 91 delicious years.




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

OpEds

Hard-boiled animal activists could threaten vaccine supply
In the post-9/11 world, the phrase "national security" conjures up images of dirty bombs, jihadists, white powder and biohazard labels. It should also bring to mind another picture: an egg. read more here »

NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »

Letters

Donation questioned
The Eagles are making a huge mistake in giving $50,000 to the deceptive Humane Society of the United States. read more here »

Food standards
It's ridiculous to suggest that small, organic farmers have a food-safety record spotless enough to justify holding them to a lower standard than other food producers. read more here »

Issue 2 failure might mean loss of jobs
Issue 2 promises to be a defining moment for agriculture in Ohio, as voters will have a rare opportunity to protect farmers from the Humane Society of the United States. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.