Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Op-Eds

Posted On August 26, 2004
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list



Soft Drink Hysteria Hard to Swallow

By: Rick Berman
Newspaper: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Legendary TV chef Julia Child, who passed away this month, warned us that "when you're afraid of your food, you don't digest it well." Unfortunately, American consumers have been scared silly about nearly every item on the menu, from beef and chicken to salmon and veggies. The latest phony food scare centers on soft drinks and their alleged link to type 2 diabetes.

While the authors of a recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association are spinning like tops to pump up new fears, they have ignored one of their own key findings.

Their data show that soda consumption has nothing to do with diabetes in women who are not obese. And even in obese women, the authors concede that diabetes may be linked to "dietary and lifestyle changes," rather than soft drink consumption itself. Bottom line: Their sweeping anti-soda conclusions are simply not justified.

Frankly, the contortions that the authors went through to demonize soda would make our own gold medal gymnasts proud. One nutrition expert at Michigan State University called their work "statistical hocus pocus."

It's no surprise that these researchers are pushing frenzy over facts. Many of the study's authors boast an extensive history of anti-soda activism. Several have close ties to the self-described "food police" at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which says it's "proud about finding something wrong with practically everything."

One of the authors sits on CSPI's scientific advisory board. Another signed a CSPI letter condemning sugar consumption — six years ago. This week he made the outlandish assertion that you should never drink any soda.

Back in 1994, Child warned that CSPI sounded "the death knell of gastronomy" and was "poisoning people's pleasure." That's the real result of these misleading and overhyped food scare studies. And this anti-soda report is just the latest example of a small band of dietary Puritans in lab coats trying to impose their diets on the rest of us.

While taking biased research with an enormous grain of salt, Child counseled that "People need to take an adult point of view. We know what we need to do: eat in moderation, small helpings, a great variety, weight-watching, moderate exercise and have fun." Now there's some health advice worth its salt, from a woman who lived 91 delicious years.



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Op-Eds

Food only part of obesity problem
The cause of obesity isn't what you think. read more here »

Leave calorie counts off the menu; Nutrition is more complex than a few figures can convey.
Although The Times’ editorial was right that "laws that protect consumers from their own unhealthful habits have more than a whiff of the nanny state about them," its support for menu labeling is wrong. read more here »

Letters To The Editor

A balanced approach to food choices
I thought Simon Chaitowitz's cynical use of Tony Snow's tragic death to promote vegetarianism was unusually offensive. read more here »

‘Chicken Little’ syndrome restricts bird flu discussion
Dr. Michael Greger has very unconventional views about the billion-to-one chance that bird flu will become a serious human health threat. And there’s a very good reason for his panic-inducing position. read more here »

Chubby kids need to move more
The latest research on exercise among American youth confirms what many of us already suspected: Most kids just aren't moving enough. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.