| More
Home / Press Center / Press Releases


Posted On March 7, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Why Soda Bans Don’t Fight Childhood Obesity

New Report By Center For Consumer Freedom Casts Doubt On Soda-Obesity Link

Washington, DC – Yesterday, two widely publicized studies claimed to show the detrimental effect of soda consumption on American children. But a new report from the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom debunks studies like these and dismantles the myths associated with the soda-obesity debate. The report, “Why Soda Bans Don’t Fight Childhood Obesity,” clarifies the record on soda’s non-existent impact on kids’ weight and alerts the public to the source of the misguided push to remove vending machines from schools.

Center for Consumer Freedom research analyst J. Justin Wilson said, “The same small group of trial lawyers and activists that sued restaurants, dairy companies, and the snack-food industry are behind this attack on soda. These entrepreneurial trial lawyers and their ‘food police’ allies are on a quest to shake down another industry with deep pockets. And, as usual, they are completely ignoring inconvenient science that proves them wrong.”

Citing a wide array of peer-reviewed health, exercise, and nutrition research, the Center’s report disputes the widely held notion that soda is a cause of obesity and instead shows that physical inactivity is the single largest contributor to obesity among children.

While the amount of calories kids eat and drink hasn’t appreciably changed in decades, physical activity rates have plummeted. In fact, only one U.S. state requires daily physical education classes school-wide. A 2005 study published in the British medical journal The Lancet showed just how damaging this lack of activity is. The authors found that among adolescent girls, “the drastic decline in habitual activity during adolescence might be a major factor in the doubling of the rate of obesity…in the past two decades, since no concomitant increase in energy intake was apparent.”

Wilson added, “Removing soda vending machines from schools to ‘cure’ childhood obesity is like filling your gas tank to fix a flat tire. It is a feel-good distraction that does nothing to address the real problem affecting our children—an epidemic of inactivity.”

To download a PDF of “Why Soda Bans Don’t Fight Childhood Obesity,” or to arrange an interview, please visit www.consumerfreedom.com/sodaobesity or call Andrew Porter at (202) 463-7112.

The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies, and consumers, working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.

For media comment, contact our media department at 202-463-7112 ext. 115




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Ad Campaigns

What's Next? What's Next?
The New York Department of Health Hype is attacking soda. Some of their friends are even attacking diet soda! click to view »

Big Apple or Big Brother? Big Apple or Big Brother?
After tackling margarine on bagels in New York, the New York Department of Health Hype is attacking soft drinks. Priorities? click to view »


OpEds

Obesity activists a public health threat
Did you know your soda is a public health menace? read more here »

NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »

Letters

Beware 'obesity tax'
Putting an IRS bean counter in every vending machine by implementing a soda and junk-food tax isn't an effective tool for reducing obesity rates. read more here »

Soda tax won't improve health
The new report from the New England Journal of Medicine claims taxing soda would reduce obesity rates while generating billions of dollars in revenue. However, many studies have found that taxing soda is not effective for shrinking our waistlines. read more here »

Soft-drink tax
Michael Jacobson's claim that taxing soft drinks is a good idea because they're "unnecessary" is great recession rhetoric. The argument that soda taxes are an effective preventive health measure is also a timely ruse. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.