| More
Home / Press Center / Press Releases


Posted On August 19, 2009
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Alarmist U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Study Is Irresponsible, Uses Deeply Flawed Standard

Every Single Fish Tested By The USGS Is Safe For Consumers To Eat, Says Consumer Watchdog Group

Washington - Today the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) published a study of 291 fish tissue samples obtained from freshwater sources across the United States between 1998 and 2005, concluding that many of them exhibited signs of "mercury contamination." The nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) is disputing the report's findings, since the USGS based its results on an Environmental Protection Agency standard for methylmercury called an "water quality criterion." This standard was intended for use by scientists who evaluate water quality - not the healthfulness of eating fish that swim in that water. Using established standards for seafood safety, every single fish identified in the new USGS study is safe for consumers to eat.

"Using the EPA's water standards to give fish a skull-and-crossbones is ridiculous," Center for Consumer Freedom Director of Research David Martosko said in response to the USGS study. "We're not talking about lead in paint. Fish is a health food. Study after study has shown that the known health advantages from eating seafood far outweigh any hypothetical health risk."

The highest level of mercury in any fish the USGS found was 1.95 parts per million, which is still less than one-fifth of the lowest level of mercury associated with adverse health effects in the established scientific literature. The Food and Drug Administration and the EPA both include a ten-fold safety margin in their consumer advisories, masking the truly enormous mercury levels that would be required to outweigh the significant health benefits derived from eating seafood.

Abnormally high levels of mercury have caused neurological problems in a very tiny number of cases (notably in Japan and Iraq, several decades ago). But mercury levels in domestic fish aren't anywhere near high enough to cause real concern. And the USGS study has absolutely nothing to say about commercial seafood that consumers purchase in stores and restaurants every day. U.S. women of childbearing age should also be aware that the entire medical literature contains exactly zero cases of fetal mercury toxicity related to fish consumption.

Martosko added: "There's nothing new about tiny traces of mercury in fish-it's been there since the first ocean creatures evolved. But we need omega-3 fatty acids and other super-nutrients in our diets. Scaring people away from seafood is the wrong approach to take, especially when no one can point to a real-world health risk."

To test-drive the Internet's only seafood calculator that balances the risks and benefits of fish consumption side-by-side, visit www.HowMuchFish.com.

The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies, and consumers, working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.

For media comment, contact our media department at 202-463-7112 ext. 115




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Ad Campaigns

Brain Washed? Brain Washed?
The animal-rights nuts at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine tried to scare Americans away from fish with a misleading ad in the Washington Post. Our rapid response made sure Post readers knew what the group was really up to… Don't let animal-rights activists brainwash you with fish stories. click to view »

Hooked on the hype? Hooked on the hype?
Discover the facts about how much mercury is in the fish you eat. click to view »


OpEds

Fishy Omega-3 risks
If the FDA's report becomes official policy, the conventional wisdom urging women of childbearing age to eat less fish will be turned completely upside-down. read more here »

Poor Children Suffer From Tuna Fears
Seafood warnings are hurting, not helping, America’s most vulnerable kids. Sad? Yes. Shameful? Absolutely. read more here »

Letters

Mercury’s ill effects overstated
The well-documented health benefits of consuming fish far outweigh any hypothetical health risks. It's time that fish regained its old reputation as "brain food." read more here »

A fish story you shouldn't swallow
Consumers shouldn't be scared away from a diet rich in seafood, despite the scary headlines generated by a recent U.S. Geological Survey report. read more here »

Little to fret over with mercury in Colorado fish
Its frustrating, but not too surprising, that so many people are overreacting to trace levels of mercury found in Colorado sport fish. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.