Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Press Center / Press Releases

Posted On September 28, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Phony Animal-Rights 'Physicians Committee' Plays Chicken With California Lawsuits

Lawsuit Group’s Lead Attorney Protests Life-saving Medical Research With PETA

Washington – Seven California lawsuits filed yesterday against restaurants that serve grilled chicken are motivated by animal-rights ideology, the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) said today. The deceptively named "Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine" (PCRM) is actually a wealthy animal rights group, not a mainstream health charity.

PCRM’s goals include transitioning Americans to a strict vegetarian diet. And publicly available tax records show that two-thirds of the group’s operating budget now comes from Nanci Alexander, an animal-rights millionaire who operates a Florida vegetarian restaurant. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has also contributed over $1.3 million.

Yesterday in Los Angeles, City News Service reported that the American Medical Association has in the past called PCRM an organization that uses "unethical tactics" and is "interested in perverting medical science." City News Service also noted that "a Newsweek article in February 2004 stated that less than 5 percent of its members are doctors and it has ties to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, an animal rights group, which has drawn criticism for some of its tactics."

PCRM lead attorney Dan Kinburn, who filed the California lawsuits yesterday, has also appeared protesting alongside PETA activists against the use of animals by medical research laboratories. A photograph of Mr. Kinburn participating in such a PETA protest can be viewed at www.consumerfreedom.com/kinburn.jpg

CCF Director of Research David Martosko said: "When will people realize that this phony ‘physicians’ group is just PETA with a lab coat? The animal rights activists at PCRM would rather save lab rats than cure cancer and AIDS. They don’t deserve a say in whether or not anyone eats a chicken sandwich."

Martosko continued: "The federal government and the American Cancer Society agree that there’s nothing dangerous about eating a chicken sandwich. But letting animal rights activists slowly force us into vegetarianism could be hazardous to everyone’s health. The last time I checked, Americans were getting sick from spinach, not grilled chicken."

To learn more about the radical animal rights activists behind the misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, visit www.PhysicianScam.com.

The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies, and consumers, working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.

For media comment, contact our media department at 202-463-7112 ext. 115




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Advertisements

Who’s Killed More Animals? Who’s Killed More Animals?
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) loves to point the finger at others, when they should be looking at their own record of killing more than 90% of the animals left in their care. According to government records PETA has killed more than 14,400 animals since 1998. click to view »

Who wants to slow cancer research? Who wants to slow cancer research?
Who wants to slow down breast cancer research? The animal rights movement. They want to end medical testing in order to save lab rats. click to view »


Op-Eds

Put Helmsley's billions to use in animal shelters
PETA and HSUS have announced their intentions to claim big slices of the $8 billion bounty. But neither one has the track record to handle such a responsibility. read more here »

California Focus: The new animal-rights battleground
The animal-rights movement is far from harmless. And since California seems to be the current animal-rights Ground Zero, it's worth considering what the movement stands for. read more here »

Letters To The Editor

'Humane' charities contribute to violence
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has spent more than $150,000 defending arsonists and other violent animal-rights criminals. read more here »

Humane Society of U.S. has a radical agenda
HSUS is a "humane society" in name only, pursuing the same fringe goals as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. read more here »

A balanced approach to food choices
I thought Simon Chaitowitz's cynical use of Tony Snow's tragic death to promote vegetarianism was unusually offensive. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.