Filed Under: The Green Fringe

To Catch A (Seed) Thief

On Friday, Canada’s highest court closed the book on self-styled anti-biotech martyr Percy Schmeiser, ruling that he had, indeed, grown genetically modified canola without paying for it. Schmeiser had become an anti-corporate poster boy of late, raising a six-figure legal defense fund by insisting at activist gatherings that the biotech plants found on his farm were brought there against his will — presumably by seed-toting birds or a pollen-carrying stiff breeze. Nonsense. The maple-leaf Supremes let stand a lower court ruling that genetically modified plants covered over 96 percent of Schmeiser’s fields, a concentration that could only be the result of planting the seed on purpose. In what may be the understatement of the year, a defeated Schmeiser told the New York Times: “It’s not nearly the victory that we were looking for.” But don’t expect a dose of judicial truth to slow down the movement to demonize science-aided food that just might save a billion human lives.

The Council of Canadians (think Ralph Nader’s Public Citizen with earmuffs) was quick to issue a news release promising a “worldwide backlash against genetically engineered foods.” The Organic Consumers Association is promoting a press release that warns of “5 million Percy Schmeisers.” And Greenpeace took an interesting, if two-faced, approach. While Greenpeace Canada attempted to politely re-cast the Supreme Court’s decision in a more activist-friendly light, European Greenpeacers took matters into their own hands — physically blockading a ship bringing biotech grain into a Greek harbor. Meanwhile, a trio of French criminals were convicted of trashing a genetically modified crop field.

Expect more anti-biotech protests in the United States during the coming months, as activists plot to disrupt and forcibly “shut down” a June biotechnology convention in San Francisco. Last year’s major anti-biotech protest event brought Percy Schmeiser to St. Louis. Odds are he’ll be in San Francisco this time around, along with assorted other activists who will claim, straight-faced, that food technology has no discernible impact on Third World hunger.

Nobel laureate Norman Borlaug said it best: “Extremists in the environmental movement, largely from rich nations and/or the privileged strata of society in poor nations, seem to be doing everything they can to stop scientific progress in its tracks.”

More on “The Green Fringe”

Take Sierra Club’s Agriculture Policy off the Menu

Posted January 19, 2015 at 10:50 am

Left-Wing Foodies Want Meat, Snacks Treated Like the Ebola Virus

Posted November 12, 2014 at 5:28 pm

Dr. Oz Oozes Scientific Illiteracy

Posted September 24, 2014 at 5:00 pm