Filed Under: Food Police

Fluffgate 2006

Be careful what you ask for. That is the lesson Massachusetts legislator Jarrett Barrios should have learned in the wake of “Fluffgate.” The lesson comes after Barrios suggested banning Fluffernutter sandwiches in Massachusetts’s schools when his son mentioned having one for lunch.

An article in today’s Christian Science Monitor describes the result:

[T]he media whipped the dispute into whitecaps, and Barrios found himself mired in a controversy that pun-happy pundits couldn’t resist calling sticky … The result: Fluffgate — an end-of-school snit made from equal parts Cambridge liberal paternalism, local pride over a homegrown product, and garish politics — deflated like a marshmallow in the noontime sun.

Barrios’ bill, which won praise from some food cops, did more than deflate his popularity with Massachusetts voters. An “angry sounding” representative from the Massachusetts State House told the Monitor:

“I think in many ways [Barrios’s bill] diminished the importance of the subject matter. There are a lot worse things out there than … I try not to even say the word. I call it the ‘F word.'”

More on “Food Police”

Is Meat the Next “Sin” We’ll Be Asked to Atone For?

Posted January 23, 2018 at 11:49 am

Ignore the Hype, Your Holiday Feast is Safe

Posted December 19, 2017 at 10:03 am

Vegans Try to Ban Hot Dogs in Schools

Posted April 25, 2017 at 11:08 am