Filed Under: Big Fat Lies Food Police

Should There Be A Warning Label for Stupid?

It’s a new decade, but the self-anointed “food police” at the so-called Center for Science in the “Public Interest” are up to their old tricks. Today CSPI revealed a letter that it’s sending to the Food and Drug Administration, begging the agency to take action on a previous CSPI request for warning labels on sugary drinks. The FDA has (thankfully) ignored CSPI for five years.

The FDA ought to reply with this message: It’s time to get with the times. Despite CSPI’s insinuations that sugary drinks are a scourge among younger Americans, science has shed a little light on the matter since the group’s first ridiculous petition. Along with general questions of “white hat bias” in studies looking at soda and obesity, a 2009 study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found no association between sugary drink consumption and weight gain in adolescents during a five-year period. That built upon similar findings in a 2008 review in the same journal.

Say it with us, all together now: Calories are calories. A calorie in one food is no more fattening than a calorie in another, a point made recently by a nutrition professor who went on a “Twinkie diet” and lost nearly 30 pounds. Instead of selectively pillorying specific foods, a more accurate label than what CSPI proposes might be: “This food contains calories. Eating too many calories may result in weight gain.”

Don’t most people already know that?

In the meantime, here’s a reminder of our own warning label—for CSPI. If only we could attach it to each of the group’s press releases this year…


More on “Big Fat Lies”

Who’s Really Giving “Food with Integrity”?

Posted April 29, 2016 at 3:45 pm

“Science” Group Demands Nutrition Groupthink

Posted April 6, 2016 at 3:47 pm

Are Dietary Guidelines Based on “Pseudoscience”?

Posted March 23, 2016 at 9:48 am