Soda Tax Descends into San Francisco

130416_CCF_DumbCalifornia_picRoughly a year after their Bay Area counterparts in Richmond rejected a $1.28 per gallon tax on soft drinks by two-to-one, San Francisco City Supervisor Scott Wiener has proposed a $2.56 per gallon tax on soda sold in the City by the Bay. Apparently, the California way to “fix” a bad idea is to double down on it.

But just like Richmond’s defeated proposal, putting a massive tax — twelve times the state’s $0.20 per gallon tax on (frequently equally if not more caloric) beer — on a single product is unlikely to affect obesity rates. An analysis by Duke-National University of Singapore researchers found that enacting a soda tax would reduce caloric intake by less than 0.1% of total daily consumption — about 12 calories per day. For comparison, food companies beat that reduction with a voluntary reformulation program.

Small wonder then that researchers from Yale and Emory universities recently warned policymakers: “Evidence suggests caution in enacting sugar-sweetened beverage taxation legislation with a core purpose of obesity reduction.” Taxing soft drinks won’t slim down San Francisco, and if the measure does pass the City Council and go before voters, it should be comprehensively rejected.

More on “Big Government”

Is Meat the Next “Sin” We’ll Be Asked to Atone For?

Posted January 23, 2018 at 11:49 am

Lawmakers Repeal, Reject Soda Taxes

Posted October 18, 2017 at 11:42 am

The Employee Rights Act Explained

Posted May 17, 2017 at 2:27 pm